← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Comparing Exenatide and Insulin Glargine in Type 2 Diabetes Patients for Whom Insulin is the Next Appropriate Therapy
Plain-language guide to NCT00099619: phase 3 randomized trial of Exenatide and Insulin Glargine, 138 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.
Key Facts
- Registry ID
- NCT00099619
- Phase
- phase 3
- Status
- completed
- Start
- 2004-09
- Completion (planned or actual)
- 2005-08
- Participants
- 138 (actual)
- Design
- randomized, open label (everyone knows who gets what), treatment
- Conditions studied
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Results posted
- not yet
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
In this phase 3 trial, researchers set out to test Exenatide and Insulin Glargine.
It had two arms (groups): exenatide/insulin glargine (experimental) and Insulin glargine/exenatide (experimental).
Arm that first receives exenatide, then crosses over to insulin glargine.
Arm that first receives insulin glargine, then crosses over to exenatide.
The registry classes the interventions as drug.
Who Took Part
Enrollment: 138 actual participants took part.
It was open to people of any sex aged from 30 years with no upper age limit.
Healthy volunteers were not accepted; participants needed the condition being studied.
Examples of who could join: Insulin therapy should be the next appropriate step of diabetes treatment. Body Mass Index (BMI) \>25 kg/m2 and \<40 kg/m2.
The full record lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: patient previously in a study involving exenatide or glucagon-like peptide-1 analogs; treated with insulin, thiazolidinediones, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, or meglitinides within 3 months prior to screening.
How the Study Was Run
It was run as a randomized, crossover and open-label study.
The participants were allocated by chance, so the Exenatide group and the comparison group should start out alike.
In the crossover set-up each of the participants took both Exenatide and the comparison in turn, acting as their own control.
Everyone knew when Exenatide was being given (open label), which is simpler to run but leaves more room for expectations to affect what is reported.
It started in 2004-09 with completion listed for 2005-08.
It ran at 26 sites in Italy (6), Australia (5), Hungary (5), Mexico (4), Greece (3) and Poland (3).
Its stated primary purpose is treatment.
What Was Measured
The main thing measured (primary outcome): Change in HbA1c (glycosylated hemoglobin) from the baseline of the first period (16-weeks of exenatide or insulin) to the end of each 16-week period (time frame: Baseline, Week 16, Week 32).
It also tracked 1 secondary outcome, for example Change in patient-reported outcomes from Baseline to the end of each 16-week period.
What This Means in Plain Language
Put simply, this is a phase 3, randomized trial of Exenatide and Insulin Glargine in 138 people.
The trial is marked completed; no results are posted to the registry yet, so nothing here describes outcomes.
More context: the Exenatide compound page and the Insulin Glargine compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compounds
Exenatide: A 39-amino-acid GLP-1 receptor agonist first identified in Gila monster venom; sold as Byetta and Bydureon for type 2 diabetes.
Insulin Glargine: A long-acting insulin analog given once daily; brands include Lantus, Toujeo, Basaglar and Semglee.
Related Pages
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.