← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Intervention to Preserve Beta-Cell Function in GAD Ab-Positive Diabetes
Plain-language guide to NCT00232375: not phased randomized trial of Insulin (regular human), 42 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.
Key Facts
- Registry ID
- NCT00232375
- Phase
- not phased
- Status
- completed
- Start
- 1996-01
- Completion (planned or actual)
- 2005-01
- Participants
- 42
- Design
- randomized, open label (everyone knows who gets what), prevention
- Conditions studied
- GAD Ab Positive Clinically Type 2 Diabetic Patients
- Results posted
- not yet
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
This registered not phased trial tested Insulin (regular human).
The researchers tested the hypothesis that insulin therapy rather than sulfonylurea (SU) treatment has a preferable outcome to reverse or preserve beta cell function in the patients with diabetes that is called slowly progressive insulin-dependent (type 1) diabetes (SPIDDM) or latent autoimmune diabetes in adult (LADA).
The registry classes the interventions as drug.
More on the Plan
Serum C-peptide response to annual oral glucose tolerance tests were followed for 57 mean months.
The primary endpoint was insulin-dependency (IDDM: integrated C-peptide values \[sigma C-peptide\] \<4 ng/ml).
Who Took Part
42 planned participants were the target.
It was open to people of any sex.
Healthy volunteers were not accepted; participants needed the condition being studied.
Examples of who could join: Subjects should use SU agents to obtain as a goal good glycemic control. Duration of diabetes within 5 years from the onset (or diagnosis).
The full record lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: subjects having history of hyperglycemia requiring insulin treatment and/or history of ketosis/ketoacidosis were excluded; subjects with malignant diseases, systemic inflammatory diseases, renal or liver disorders or malabsorption were also excluded.
How the Study Was Run
The set-up was randomized, parallel-group and open-label.
Random assignment meant chance, not the researchers, decided who got Insulin (regular human) and who got the comparison, which limits bias.
The Insulin (regular human) group and the comparison group ran side by side rather than switching.
Being open-label, the Insulin (regular human) study did not mask who received what.
It started in 1996-01 with completion listed for 2005-01.
It ran at 1 site in Japan.
Its stated primary purpose is prevention.
What Was Measured
Researchers chose this as the main measure: The primary endpoint was insulin-dependency (IDDM: integrated C-peptide values [sigma C-peptide] <4 ng/ml).
What This Means in Plain Language
Put simply, this is a not phased, randomized trial of Insulin (regular human) in 42 people.
The trial is marked completed; no results are posted to the registry yet, so nothing here describes outcomes.
More context: the Insulin (regular human) compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compound
Insulin (regular human): The 51-amino-acid pancreatic hormone that lowers blood glucose; this page covers regular (short-acting) insulin studied in human trials.
Related Pages
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.