← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Effect on Weight Loss of Exenatide Versus Placebo
Plain-language guide to NCT00375492: phase 3 randomized trial of Exenatide, 196 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.
Key Facts
- Registry ID
- NCT00375492
- Phase
- phase 3
- Status
- completed
- Start
- 2006-09
- Completion (planned or actual)
- 2008-02
- Participants
- 196 (actual)
- Design
- randomized, double-blind, treatment
- Conditions studied
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Results posted
- yes
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
In this phase 3 trial, researchers set out to test Exenatide.
This trial is designed to compare the effects of twice-daily exenatide and twice-daily placebo on weight loss.
This trial will evaluate overweight and obese subjects with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycemic control with metformin, sulfonylurea, or metformin plus a sulfonylurea.
Subjects will be treated with exenatide or placebo in addition to their current oral antidiabetes agent regimen and participate in a lifestyle modification program.
It had two arms (groups): Group A (experimental) and Group B (placebo comparator).
The registry classes the interventions as drug.
Who Took Part
Enrollment: 196 actual participants took part.
It was open to people of any sex aged from 18 years up to 75 years.
Healthy volunteers were not accepted; participants needed the condition being studied.
Examples of who could join: Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for at least 6 months. Have a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 25 kg/m\^2 to 39.9 kg/m\^2, inclusive.
The full record lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: have conditions contraindicating metformin and/or sulfonylurea use; have had a change in lipid-lowering agents within 6 weeks of screening; have received glucagon-like peptide-1 (glp-1) analogs, or dipeptidyl peptidase-iv inhibitors (dpp-iv inhibitors) or have previously participated in this study.
How the Study Was Run
Design: randomized, parallel-group and double-blind.
Random assignment meant chance, not the researchers, decided who got Exenatide and who got the comparison, which limits bias.
Groups ran in parallel: each of the participants stayed in one arm throughout.
As a double-blind Exenatide study, the assignments were hidden from both participants and investigators until the end.
Those kept unaware of assignments: participant and investigator.
It started in 2006-09 with completion listed for 2008-02.
It ran at 10 sites in United States (10).
Its stated primary purpose is treatment.
What Was Measured
The main thing measured (primary outcome): Change From Baseline in Body Weight (time frame: Baseline, Week 24).
It also tracked 11 secondary outcomes, for example Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24, Change From Baseline in 6-point Self Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profile at Week 24, Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Week 24, Ratio of Homeostatic Model Assessment-Beta Cell (HOMA-B) at Week 24 to HOMA-B at Baseline, Ratio of Homeostatic Model Assessment-Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA-S) at Week 24 to HOMA-S at Baseline and Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol at Week 24.
What This Means in Plain Language
Put simply, this is a phase 3, randomized trial of Exenatide in 196 people.
The trial is marked completed; results are posted on the registry, and this page does not restate them.
More context: the Exenatide compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compound
Exenatide: A 39-amino-acid GLP-1 receptor agonist first identified in Gila monster venom; sold as Byetta and Bydureon for type 2 diabetes.
Related Pages
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.