← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Intravenous Versus Usual Subcutaneous Insulin in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Plain-language guide to NCT00472381: phase 2, phase 3 randomized trial of Insulin (regular human), 180 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.
Key Facts
- Registry ID
- NCT00472381
- Phase
- phase 2, phase 3
- Status
- completed
- Start
- 2007-05
- Completion (planned or actual)
- 2012-06
- Participants
- 180 (actual)
- Design
- randomized, open label (everyone knows who gets what), treatment
- Conditions studied
- Acute Stroke; Acute Cerebral Ischemia
- Results posted
- not yet
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
In this phase 2, phase 3 trial, researchers set out to test Insulin (regular human).
But the modalities of glucose lowering are still debated.
It had 1 arm (groups): 2 (experimental).
Insulin.
The registry classes the interventions as drug.
More on the Plan
Yet, the efficiency of aggressive insulin serum glucose control is not established.
Furthermore the modalities of insulin administration are discussed since US and European guidelines recommend subcutaneous administration, whereas some groups use intravenous administration of insulin.
The study will include carotid territory stroke at the acute stage (\< 6 hours of onset) confirmed by MRI, and randomized in intravenous versus subcutaneous insulin.
Who Took Part
Enrollment: 180 actual participants took part.
It was open to people of any sex aged from 19 years with no upper age limit.
Healthy volunteers were not accepted; participants needed the condition being studied.
Examples of who could join: Age over 18 years. Carotid territory stroke. MRI performed in the first five hours of stroke onset. Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) \> 4 or \< 26. Time between MRI and treatment under one hour.
The full record lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: pre-existing modified rankin scale of three or higher.
How the Study Was Run
Design: randomized, parallel-group and open-label.
The participants were allocated by chance, so the Insulin (regular human) group and the comparison group should start out alike.
Groups ran in parallel: each of the participants stayed in one arm throughout.
Being open-label, the Insulin (regular human) study did not mask who received what.
It started in 2007-05 with completion listed for 2012-06.
It ran at 1 site in France.
Its stated primary purpose is treatment.
What Was Measured
Researchers chose this as the main measure: Percentage of patients in the glucose target range within 24 hours of the initiation of treatment (time frame: 24 hours).
It also tracked 3 secondary outcomes, for example Modified Rankin Scale at three months and Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) infarct growth at one day.
What This Means in Plain Language
Put simply, this is a phase 2, phase 3, randomized trial of Insulin (regular human) in 180 people.
The trial is marked completed; no results are posted to the registry yet, so nothing here describes outcomes.
More context: the Insulin (regular human) compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compound
Insulin (regular human): The 51-amino-acid pancreatic hormone that lowers blood glucose; this page covers regular (short-acting) insulin studied in human trials.
Related Pages
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.