← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
An Exploratory Study of the Effect of Treatment Interruption on Safety of Exenatide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Plain-language guide to NCT00516048: phase 3 non-randomized trial of Exenatide, 58 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.
Key Facts
- Registry ID
- NCT00516048
- Phase
- phase 3
- Status
- completed
- Start
- 2007-08
- Completion (planned or actual)
- 2008-04
- Participants
- 58 (actual)
- Design
- non-randomized, open label (everyone knows who gets what), treatment
- Conditions studied
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Results posted
- yes
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
The trial (phase 3) is built around Exenatide.
The primary purpose of this study is to assess the anti-exenatide-antibody response to exenatide re-exposure as measured by anti-exenatide antibodies and incidence of treatment-emergent allergy and hypersensitivity reactions following a period of treatment interruption, in patients previously exposed to exenatide.
It had two arms (groups): Exenatide:Treatment-Emergent Antibody Negative (experimental) and Exenatide:Treatment-Emergent Antibody Positive (experimental).
The registry classes the interventions as drug.
Who Took Part
Enrollment: 58 actual participants took part.
It was open to people of any sex aged from 20 years with no upper age limit.
Healthy volunteers were not accepted; participants needed the condition being studied.
Examples of who could join: Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Have interrupted exenatide treatment for a period of at least 2 months.
The full record lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: have previously completed or withdrawn from this study; have taken marketed exenatide (byetta) during the interim period between studies gwao, gwap, gwat, or gwba and the current study; used drugs for weight loss (for example, xenical® \[orlistat\], meridia® \[sibutramine\], acutrim® \[phenylpropanolamine\], accomplia® \[rimonabant\], or similar over-the-counter medications) within 3 months of screening.
How the Study Was Run
It was run as a non-randomized, parallel-group and open-label study.
The Exenatide group and the comparison group ran side by side rather than switching.
Nothing was hidden in this open-label Exenatide study: the participants and staff both knew the treatment.
It started in 2007-08 with completion listed for 2008-04.
It ran at 13 sites in Canada (3), Hungary (3), Italy (3), South Korea (3) and Australia (1).
Its stated primary purpose is treatment.
What Was Measured
Primary outcome: Treatment-emergent Antibody Status (Maximum Titer Level Experienced) (time frame: 24 weeks). Incidence of Potentially Immune-related Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (time frame: 24 weeks).
It also tracked 1 secondary outcome, for example Change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) From Baseline to Endpoint.
What This Means in Plain Language
Put simply, this is a phase 3, non-randomized trial of Exenatide in 58 people.
The trial is marked completed; results are posted on the registry, and this page does not restate them.
More context: the Exenatide compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compound
Exenatide: A 39-amino-acid GLP-1 receptor agonist first identified in Gila monster venom; sold as Byetta and Bydureon for type 2 diabetes.
Related Pages
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.