← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies

An Exploratory Study of the Effect of Treatment Interruption on Safety of Exenatide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Plain-language guide to NCT00516048: phase 3 non-randomized trial of Exenatide, 58 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.

Key Facts

Registry ID
NCT00516048
Phase
phase 3
Status
completed
Start
2007-08
Completion (planned or actual)
2008-04
Participants
58 (actual)
Design
non-randomized, open label (everyone knows who gets what), treatment
Conditions studied
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Results posted
yes

What This Study Did, in Plain Language

What Was Tested

The trial (phase 3) is built around Exenatide.

The primary purpose of this study is to assess the anti-exenatide-antibody response to exenatide re-exposure as measured by anti-exenatide antibodies and incidence of treatment-emergent allergy and hypersensitivity reactions following a period of treatment interruption, in patients previously exposed to exenatide.

It had two arms (groups): Exenatide:Treatment-Emergent Antibody Negative (experimental) and Exenatide:Treatment-Emergent Antibody Positive (experimental).

The registry classes the interventions as drug.

Who Took Part

Enrollment: 58 actual participants took part.

It was open to people of any sex aged from 20 years with no upper age limit.

Healthy volunteers were not accepted; participants needed the condition being studied.

Examples of who could join: Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Have interrupted exenatide treatment for a period of at least 2 months.

The full record lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: have previously completed or withdrawn from this study; have taken marketed exenatide (byetta) during the interim period between studies gwao, gwap, gwat, or gwba and the current study; used drugs for weight loss (for example, xenical® \[orlistat\], meridia® \[sibutramine\], acutrim® \[phenylpropanolamine\], accomplia® \[rimonabant\], or similar over-the-counter medications) within 3 months of screening.

How the Study Was Run

It was run as a non-randomized, parallel-group and open-label study.

The Exenatide group and the comparison group ran side by side rather than switching.

Nothing was hidden in this open-label Exenatide study: the participants and staff both knew the treatment.

It started in 2007-08 with completion listed for 2008-04.

It ran at 13 sites in Canada (3), Hungary (3), Italy (3), South Korea (3) and Australia (1).

Its stated primary purpose is treatment.

What Was Measured

Primary outcome: Treatment-emergent Antibody Status (Maximum Titer Level Experienced) (time frame: 24 weeks). Incidence of Potentially Immune-related Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (time frame: 24 weeks).

It also tracked 1 secondary outcome, for example Change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) From Baseline to Endpoint.

What This Means in Plain Language

Put simply, this is a phase 3, non-randomized trial of Exenatide in 58 people.

The trial is marked completed; results are posted on the registry, and this page does not restate them.

More context: the Exenatide compound page, all human trials.

Our Notes on the Compound

Exenatide: A 39-amino-acid GLP-1 receptor agonist first identified in Gila monster venom; sold as Byetta and Bydureon for type 2 diabetes.

Related Pages

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.