← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Effect of Exenatide on Abdominal Fat Distribution in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Pretreated With Metformin
Plain-language guide to NCT00701935: phase 2 randomized trial of Exenatide, 80 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.
Key Facts
- Registry ID
- NCT00701935
- Phase
- phase 2
- Status
- terminated early
- Start
- 2008-08
- Completion (planned or actual)
- 2012-01
- Participants
- 80 (actual)
- Design
- randomized, double-blind, treatment
- Conditions studied
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Results posted
- yes
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
In this phase 2 trial, researchers set out to test Exenatide.
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial will assess the effects of twice-daily subcutaneous injection with exenatide versus treatment with matching placebo injection on abdominal visceral fat content.
It had two arms (groups): 1 (placebo comparator) and 2 (experimental).
The registry classes the interventions as drug.
Who Took Part
Enrollment: 80 actual participants took part.
It was open to people of any sex aged from 18 years up to 85 years.
Healthy volunteers were not accepted; participants needed the condition being studied.
Examples of who could join: Patients between 18 and 85 years of age, inclusive. Patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients have a history of stable body weight (not varying by \>2 kg in the 3 months prior to Visit 1). Medications for the treatment of high blood pressure are stable with respect to treatment regimen for 4 weeks prior to Visit 1. Stable regimen of lipid-lowering agents for 6 weeks prior to Visit 1.
The full record lists 8 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: have a history of renal transplantation, or are currently receiving renal dialysis; known or are likely to become transfusion dependent during the study; have active, symptomatic proliferative retinopathy.
How the Study Was Run
Design: randomized, parallel-group and double-blind.
Random assignment meant chance, not the researchers, decided who got Exenatide and who got the comparison, which limits bias.
Groups ran in parallel: each of the participants stayed in one arm throughout.
As a double-blind Exenatide study, the assignments were hidden from both participants and investigators until the end.
Those kept unaware of assignments: participant and investigator.
It started in 2008-08 with completion listed for 2012-01.
It ran at 17 sites in Canada (12) and United States (5).
Its stated primary purpose is treatment.
What Was Measured
Researchers chose this as the main measure: Percentage Change in Abdominal Visceral Fat From Baseline to 6 Months (time frame: baseline, 6 months).
It also tracked 12 secondary outcomes, for example Percentage Change in Total Abdominal Fat From Baseline to 6 Months, Percentage Change in Subcutaneous Abdominal Fat From Baseline to 6 Months, Change in HbA1c From Baseline to 6 Months, Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to 6 Months, Change in Weight From Baseline to 6 Months and Change in Systolic Blood Pressure From Baseline to 6 Months.
What This Means in Plain Language
Put simply, this is a phase 2, randomized trial of Exenatide in 80 people.
It ended early (terminated); results are posted on the registry, and this page does not restate them.
More context: the Exenatide compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compound
Exenatide: A 39-amino-acid GLP-1 receptor agonist first identified in Gila monster venom; sold as Byetta and Bydureon for type 2 diabetes.
Related Pages
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.