← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies

Carbetocin at Elective Cesarean Delivery

Plain-language guide to NCT01262742: not phased randomized trial of Carbetocin, 80 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.

Key Facts

Registry ID
NCT01262742
Phase
not phased
Status
completed
Start
2010-11
Completion (planned or actual)
2011-03
Participants
80 (actual)
Design
randomized, quadruple-blind, treatment
Conditions studied
Postpartum Hemorrhage
Results posted
not yet

What This Study Did, in Plain Language

What Was Tested

In this not phased trial, researchers set out to test Carbetocin.

Oxytocin has a very short duration of action, which requires a continuous infusion to achieve sustained uterotonic activity.

It had five arms (groups): one (active comparator), one (active comparator), one (active comparator), one (active comparator) and one (active comparator).

The registry classes the interventions as drug.

More on the Plan

In addition, patients receiving carbetocin may experience less blood loss, and require less additional uterotonics when compared with oxytocin.

It may also contribute in establishing carbetocin as a substitute to oxytocin for elective cesarean section at their institution as well as others.

Who Took Part

The registry lists 80 actual participants took part.

It was open to women only aged from 18 years up to 50 years.

Healthy volunteers could join, not only people with the condition.

Examples of who could join: All patients planned for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia;. All patients who gave written informed consent to participate in this study.

The full record lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: all patients who refuse to give written informed consent; all patients who claim allergy or hypersensitivity to carbetocin or oxytocin; all patients with hepatic, renal, and vascular disease,.

How the Study Was Run

It was run as a randomized, parallel-group and quadruple-blind study.

Random assignment meant chance, not the researchers, decided who got Carbetocin and who got the comparison, which limits bias.

The Carbetocin group and the comparison group ran side by side rather than switching.

As a double-blind Carbetocin study, the assignments were hidden from both participants and investigators until the end.

Those kept unaware of assignments: participant, care provider, investigator and outcomes assessor.

It started in 2010-11 with completion listed for 2011-03.

It ran at 1 site in Canada.

Its stated primary purpose is treatment.

What Was Measured

Researchers chose this as the main measure: Uterine tone (time frame: 2 minutes).

It also tracked 3 secondary outcomes, for example Uterine tone, Blood loss and Side effects.

What This Means in Plain Language

Put simply, this is a not phased, randomized trial of Carbetocin in 80 people.

The trial is marked completed; no results are posted to the registry yet, so nothing here describes outcomes.

More context: the Carbetocin compound page, all human trials.

Our Notes on the Compound

Carbetocin: A long-acting oxytocin analog used outside the US to prevent bleeding after childbirth; also studied intranasally in Prader-Willi syndrome.

Related Pages

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.