← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Labour Augmentation by Means of Oxytocin - Obstetric Outcome and Women's Experiences
Plain-language guide to NCT01263158: not phased randomized trial of Oxytocin, 2072 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.
Key Facts
- Registry ID
- NCT01263158
- Phase
- not phased
- Status
- completed
- Start
- 1998-10
- Completion (planned or actual)
- 2003-12
- Participants
- 2072 (actual)
- Design
- randomized, open label (everyone knows who gets what), treatment
- Conditions studied
- Slow Labour Progress
- Results posted
- not yet
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
In this not phased trial, researchers set out to test Oxytocin.
Oxytocin augmentation is widely used to treat slow labour despite associated risks for the fetus.
An ongoing debate concerns whether oxytocin should be administered directly or postponed after arrested labour.
It had two arms (groups): Expectant group (experimental) and Early oxytocin group (no intervention).
Arrest in labour progress for 2-3 hours and no progress after amniotomy. Expectancy of standard oxytocin treatment for 3 hours.
Arrest in labour progress for 2-3 hours and no progress after amniotomy. Oxytocin treatment started within 20 minutes.
The registry classes the interventions as other.
More on the Plan
In contemporary handling of labouring women in the western world, it has become extremely common to intervene through "active" or disciplined" management (Enkin et al., Widela et al., Gerdhardstein et al., Frigoletto et al).
It is a widespread routine - and potential side effects will therefore have a great impact.
The effects, when evaluated, are short-term effects of maternal (obstetric) and fetal outcomes.
Only one of the studies found sought the women's view on the augmentation procedures (Enkin).
Who Took Part
2072 actual participants took part.
It was open to women only aged from 18 years up to 48 years.
Healthy volunteers were not accepted; participants needed the condition being studied.
How the Study Was Run
The set-up was randomized and open-label.
Because people in this Oxytocin study were split into groups at random, differences between the groups are less likely to reflect who happened to join each one.
Nothing was hidden in this open-label Oxytocin study: the participants and staff both knew the treatment.
It started in 1998-10 with completion listed for 2003-12.
It ran at 1 site in Sweden.
Its stated primary purpose is treatment.
What Was Measured
Primary outcome: Mode of delivery (spontaneous vaginal, instrumental vaginal or caesarean delivery).
It also tracked 4 secondary outcomes, for example Postpartum haemorrhage, Sphincter lacerations, Need of neonatal intensive care and Maternal experiences of childbirth.
What This Means in Plain Language
Put simply, this is a not phased, randomized trial of Oxytocin in 2072 people.
With 2072 participants it is a large trial for this field.
The trial is marked completed; no results are posted to the registry yet, so nothing here describes outcomes.
More context: the Oxytocin compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compound
Oxytocin: A peptide hormone with established obstetric medical uses and a less settled role in research on behavior, sexual function and appetite.
Related Pages
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.