← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Efficacy of Everolimus Alone or in Combination With Pasireotide LAR in Advanced PNET
Plain-language guide to NCT01374451: phase 2 randomized trial of Pasireotide, 160 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.
Key Facts
- Registry ID
- NCT01374451
- Phase
- phase 2
- Status
- terminated early
- Start
- 2011-06
- Completion (planned or actual)
- 2015-02
- Participants
- 160 (actual)
- Design
- randomized, open label (everyone knows who gets what), treatment
- Conditions studied
- Islet Cell Tumor
- Results posted
- yes
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
This registered phase 2 trial tested Pasireotide.
This study will estimate the treatment effect of everolimus in combination with pasireotide LAR relative to everolimus alone on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced progressive PNET.
A planned primary analysis was completed with data cut of 02-Apr-2014.
The study did not meet its primary objective, which was based on progression-free survival (PFS) as per local radiology assessment and was prematurely terminated with the last patient last visit on 19-Feb-2015.
It had two arms (groups): Paseriotide LAR + Everolimus (experimental) and Everolimus (experimental).
The registry classes the interventions as drug.
Who Took Part
160 actual participants took part.
It was open to people of any sex aged from 18 years with no upper age limit.
Healthy volunteers were not accepted; participants needed the condition being studied.
Examples of who could join: Advanced histologically confirmed well differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Progressive disease within the last 12 months. Measurable disease per RECIST Version 1.0 determined by multiphase MRI or triphasic CT.
The full record lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: patients currently requiring somatostatin analog treatment; prior therapy with mtor inhibitors or pasireotide; patients with more than 2 prior systemic treatment regimens.
How the Study Was Run
The set-up was randomized, parallel-group and open-label.
The participants were allocated by chance, so the Pasireotide group and the comparison group should start out alike.
Groups ran in parallel: each of the participants stayed in one arm throughout.
Being open-label, the Pasireotide study did not mask who received what.
It started in 2011-06 with completion listed for 2015-02.
It ran at 47 sites in Belgium (5), France (5), United States (4), Hungary (3), Italy (3) and Spain (3).
Its stated primary purpose is treatment.
What Was Measured
Primary outcome: Progression-free Survival (PFS) Per Local Radiological Review (time frame: Once 80 PFS events had occurred aproximately after 24 months).
It also tracked 11 secondary outcomes, for example Safety and Tolerability Profile of Everolimus Alone or in Combination With Pasireotide LAR, Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Per Radiology Review, Duration of Response (DoR), Overall Survival (OS) Using Kaplan Meier Method, PFS and the Predictive Probability of Success in Phase III and Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Per Radiology Review.
What This Means in Plain Language
Put simply, this is a phase 2, randomized trial of Pasireotide in 160 people.
It ended early (terminated); results are posted on the registry, and this page does not restate them.
More context: the Pasireotide compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compound
Pasireotide: An FDA-approved multi-receptor somatostatin analog for Cushing's disease and acromegaly; high blood sugar is a common side effect.
Related Pages
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.