← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Carbetocin vs. Oxytocin: In-vitro Myometrial Contractions With and Without Oxytocin Pre-treatment
Plain-language guide to NCT01689298: not phased non-randomized trial of Oxytocin and Carbetocin, 20 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.
Key Facts
- Registry ID
- NCT01689298
- Phase
- not phased
- Status
- completed
- Start
- 2010-01
- Completion (planned or actual)
- 2012-03
- Participants
- 20 (actual)
- Design
- non-randomized, open label (everyone knows who gets what), treatment
- Conditions studied
- Postpartum Hemorrhage
- Results posted
- not yet
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
The trial (not phased) is built around Oxytocin and Carbetocin.
The purpose of this study is to compare the ability of an isolated sample of uterine muscle tissue (in a tissue bath) to contract in the presence of various drugs.
Oxytocin is an old standard, but seems to suffer from a desensitization phenomenon.
It had two arms (groups): No drug pre-treatment (active comparator) and Drug pre-treatment (active comparator).
The registry classes the interventions as drug.
More on the Plan
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a major cause of maternal mortality and morbidity.
Patients participating in this study will be asked to donate a very small sample of uterine tissue during Cesarean section, which will be tested in the laboratory for the ability to contract in response to the uterotonics oxytocin and carbetocin.
The researchers will seek to better understand the effects of these drugs by comparing their contractile capability in isolated uterine tissue.
Who Took Part
Enrollment: 20 actual participants took part.
It was open to women only.
Healthy volunteers could join, not only people with the condition.
Examples of who could join: Gestational age 37-41 weeks. Non-laboring patients, not exposed to exogenous oxytocin. Patients requiring primary or first repeat Cesarean section. Cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
The full record lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: patients who require general anesthesia; patient who had previous myometrial surgery or more than one previous cesarean section; patients with placental anomalies.
How the Study Was Run
Design: non-randomized, parallel-group and open-label.
Groups ran in parallel: each of the participants stayed in one arm throughout.
Being open-label, the Oxytocin study did not mask who received what.
It started in 2010-01 with completion listed for 2012-03.
It ran at 1 site in Canada.
Its stated primary purpose is treatment.
What Was Measured
The main thing measured (primary outcome): Amplitude of contraction (time frame: 6-8 hours).
It also tracked 3 secondary outcomes, for example Integrated area under response curve (AUC), Basal tone and Frequency of contraction.
What This Means in Plain Language
Put simply, this is a not phased, non-randomized trial of Oxytocin and Carbetocin in 20 people.
Its size is small, so on its own it can only give an early look.
The trial is marked completed; no results are posted to the registry yet, so nothing here describes outcomes.
More context: the Oxytocin compound page and the Carbetocin compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compounds
Oxytocin: A peptide hormone with established obstetric medical uses and a less settled role in research on behavior, sexual function and appetite.
Carbetocin: A long-acting oxytocin analog used outside the US to prevent bleeding after childbirth; also studied intranasally in Prader-Willi syndrome.
Related Pages
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.