← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Epidural Calcitonin in Lower Limb Amputation
Plain-language guide to NCT02115360: not phased randomized trial of Calcitonin, 60 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.
Key Facts
- Registry ID
- NCT02115360
- Phase
- not phased
- Status
- completed
- Start
- 2014-04
- Completion (planned or actual)
- 2016-08
- Participants
- 60 (actual)
- Design
- randomized, triple-blind, prevention
- Conditions studied
- Amputation Stumps
- Results posted
- not yet
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
This registered not phased trial tested Calcitonin.
A prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial design will be used in a cohort of sixty patients of both genders, physical status American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) I and II who will undergo lower limb amputation, will be enrolled into the present study.
Patients will divided randomly into two equal groups: Epidural Bupivacain-Calcitonin and fentanyl (BC) Group and Bupivacain- fentanyl (BF) Group, comprising of 30 patients each.
It had two arms (groups): Calcitonin (active comparator) and fentanyl (active comparator).
The registry classes the interventions as drug.
More on the Plan
A cohort of sixty patients of both genders, physical status American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) I and II who will undergo lower limb amputation, will be enrolled into the present study.
Who Took Part
60 actual participants took part.
It was open to people of any sex aged from 18 years up to 60 years.
Healthy volunteers were not accepted; participants needed the condition being studied.
Examples of who could join: Prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial design will be used in a cohort of sixty patients of both genders. Physical status American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) I and II. Will undergo lower limb amputation.
The full record lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: history of pituitary gland dysfunction; cardiac disease; chronic obstructive respiratory disease.
How the Study Was Run
The set-up was randomized, parallel-group and triple-blind.
Because people in this Calcitonin study were split into groups at random, differences between the groups are less likely to reflect who happened to join each one.
Groups ran in parallel: each of the participants stayed in one arm throughout.
Blinding on both sides kept the participants and researchers unaware of who received Calcitonin.
Those kept unaware of assignments: participant, care provider and investigator.
It started in 2014-04 with completion listed for 2016-08.
It ran at 1 site in Egypt.
Its stated primary purpose is prevention.
What Was Measured
Primary outcome: visual analogue scale (time frame: 48 hours).
It also tracked 1 secondary outcome, for example Analgesic consumption.
What This Means in Plain Language
Put simply, this is a not phased, randomized trial of Calcitonin in 60 people.
The trial is marked completed; no results are posted to the registry yet, so nothing here describes outcomes.
More context: the Calcitonin compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compound
Calcitonin: A 32-amino-acid hormone that lowers blood calcium; salmon calcitonin (Miacalcin) has been used for Paget disease and osteoporosis.
Related Pages
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.