← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Timing of Umbilical Cord Occlusion in Premature Babies( <33 w). Delayed vs Early.
Plain-language guide to NCT02187874: not phased randomized trial of Oxytocin, 150 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.
Key Facts
- Registry ID
- NCT02187874
- Phase
- not phased
- Status
- status unknown
- Start
- 2014-07
- Completion (planned or actual)
- 2017-07
- Participants
- 150 (estimated)
- Design
- randomized, open label (everyone knows who gets what), prevention
- Conditions studied
- Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping Benefits; Postpartum Haemorrhage; Intraventricular Haemorrhage
- Results posted
- not yet
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
In this not phased trial, researchers set out to test Oxytocin.
Early cord clamping after delivery has been common practice for many decades as part of the active management of the third stage of labour.
It had two arms (groups): early umbilical cord occlusion (active comparator) and delayed umbilical cord occlusion (experimental).
The registry classes the interventions as drug and procedure.
Who Took Part
The registry lists 150 planned participants were the target.
It was open to women only aged from 18 years with no upper age limit.
Healthy volunteers could join, not only people with the condition.
Examples of who could join: Deliveries ( either vaginal or by C-section) between 26 and 32.6 weeks of gestation. Patients must be over 18 years old. Patient understands and signs informed consent.
The full record lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: urgent c-section; gestational age under 22 or over 33 weeks; major uterine malformations.
How the Study Was Run
The set-up was randomized, parallel-group and open-label.
The participants were allocated by chance, so the Oxytocin group and the comparison group should start out alike.
The Oxytocin group and the comparison group ran side by side rather than switching.
Everyone knew when Oxytocin was being given (open label), which is simpler to run but leaves more room for expectations to affect what is reported.
It started in 2014-07 with completion listed for 2017-07.
It ran at 1 site in Spain.
Its stated primary purpose is prevention.
What Was Measured
The main thing measured (primary outcome): Number of red blood cell transfusions to the newborn (time frame: for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 months). Intraventricular Haemorrhage incidence (time frame: from delivery, for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 months). Maternal postpartum haemorrhage incidence (time frame: within 24 hours after birth).
It also tracked 1 secondary outcome, for example Neonatal mortality.
What This Means in Plain Language
Put simply, this is a not phased, randomized trial of Oxytocin in 150 people.
Its status is unknown; no results are posted to the registry yet, so nothing here describes outcomes.
More context: the Oxytocin compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compound
Oxytocin: A peptide hormone with established obstetric medical uses and a less settled role in research on behavior, sexual function and appetite.
Related Pages
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.