← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
A Study to Compare Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of SAR342434 to Insulin Lispro in Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes
Plain-language guide to NCT02273258: phase 1 randomized trial of Insulin Lispro, 30 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.
Key Facts
- Registry ID
- NCT02273258
- Phase
- phase 1
- Status
- completed
- Start
- 2013-03
- Completion (planned or actual)
- 2013-07
- Participants
- 30 (actual)
- Design
- randomized, double-blind, treatment
- Conditions studied
- Type 1 Diabetes
- Results posted
- not yet
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
The trial (phase 1) is built around Insulin Lispro.
Primary Objective: To compare exposure and activity of SAR342434 to US-approved and EU-approved Humalog®.
Secondary Objective: To assess the safety and tolerability of SAR342434.
It had three arms (groups): Test (T) (experimental), Reference 1 (R1) (active comparator) and Reference 2 (R2) (active comparator).
The registry classes the interventions as drug.
Who Took Part
The registry lists 30 actual participants took part.
It was open to people of any sex aged from 18 years up to 65 years.
Healthy volunteers were not accepted; participants needed the condition being studied.
Examples of who could join: Male or female subjects with diabetes mellitus type 1 for more than one year. Stable insulin regimen for at least 2 months prior to study. Normal findings in medical history and physical examination (cardiovascular system, chest and lungs, thyroid, abdomen, nervous system, skin and mucosae, and musculo-skeletal system), vital signs, electrocardiogram (ECG) and safety lab.
The full record lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: more than one episode of severe hypoglycemia with seizure, coma or requiring assistance of another person during the past 6 months; frequent headaches and/or migraine, recurrent nausea and/or vomiting (more than twice a month; presence or history of drug hypersensitivity, or allergic disease diagnosed and treated by a physician.
How the Study Was Run
It was run as a randomized, crossover and double-blind study.
Random assignment meant chance, not the researchers, decided who got Insulin Lispro and who got the comparison, which limits bias.
In the crossover set-up each of the participants took both Insulin Lispro and the comparison in turn, acting as their own control.
As a double-blind Insulin Lispro study, the assignments were hidden from both participants and investigators until the end.
Those kept unaware of assignments: participant and investigator.
It started in 2013-03 with completion listed for 2013-07.
It ran at 1 site in Germany.
Its stated primary purpose is treatment.
What Was Measured
Researchers chose this as the main measure: Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of SAR342434, US-approved Humalog and EU-approved Humalog (time frame: 12 hours). Area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) of SAR342434, US-approved Humalog and EU-approved Humalog (time frame: 12 hours). Area under the body weight standardized glucose infusion rate (GIR) versus time curve from 0 to 12 hours post administration (GIR-AUC0-12) (time frame: 12 hours).
It also tracked 9 secondary outcomes, for example The fractional area under the concentration versus time curve from 0 or y to x hours post administration (INS-AUC0 or Y to X), NS-tmax, INS-t1/2z, Maximum smoothed body weight standardized GIR (GIRmax) and Time to GIRmax (GIR-tmax).
What This Means in Plain Language
Put simply, this is a phase 1, randomized trial of Insulin Lispro in 30 people.
Its size is small, so on its own it can only give an early look.
The trial is marked completed; no results are posted to the registry yet, so nothing here describes outcomes.
More context: the Insulin Lispro compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compound
Insulin Lispro: A rapid-acting mealtime insulin analog; brands include Humalog, Admelog and Lyumjev.
Related Pages
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.