← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Ulipristal Acetate for the Preoperative Management of Hypoechoic Cellular Leiomyomas
Plain-language guide to NCT02361905: phase 4 randomized trial of Leuprolide, cellulite, 42 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.
Key Facts
- Registry ID
- NCT02361905
- Phase
- phase 4
- Status
- status unknown
- Start
- 2015-02
- Completion (planned or actual)
- 2017-09
- Participants
- 42 (estimated)
- Design
- randomized, double-blind, treatment
- Conditions studied
- Fibroid
- Results posted
- not yet
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
This registered phase 4 trial tested Leuprolide for cellulite.
Hypoechoic CLs should be more responsive to ulipristal acetate treatment than common leiomyomas.
It had two arms (groups): Ulipristal acetate (experimental) and Leuprolile acetate (active comparator).
The registry classes the interventions as drug.
More on the Plan
They are histologically composed by smooth muscle cells with bland, uniform, cigar-shaped nuclei that are arranged in interlacing bundles, showing little or no mitotic activity.
The presenting symptoms do not differ from those of patients with typical leiomyomas.
On gross examination, CLs are more often soft and appear more tan or yellow and less circumscribed than the usual leiomyomas.
Pre-operatively, anyway, CLs can be recognized at ultrasound evaluation because they appear as hypoechoic uterine lesions.
Who Took Part
The registry lists 42 planned participants were the target.
It was open to women only aged from 18 years up to 55 years.
Healthy volunteers could join, not only people with the condition.
Examples of who could join: Hypoechoic uterine leiomyoma (echogenicity \<3),. Intramural leiomyomas with an ultrasonographic size \<20 cm but \>4cm,. Indication to surgery (symptoms of menometrorrhagia,. Pelvic pain or pelvic pressure.
The full record lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: submucosal leiomyoma,; endometrial hyperplasia with atypia,; history of uterine surgery.
How the Study Was Run
It was run as a randomized, parallel-group and double-blind study.
The cellulite participants were allocated by chance, so the Leuprolide group and the comparison group should start out alike.
The Leuprolide group and the comparison group ran side by side rather than switching.
As a double-blind Leuprolide study, the assignments were hidden from both participants and investigators until the end.
Those kept unaware of assignments: investigator and outcomes assessor.
It started in 2015-02 with completion listed for 2017-09.
It ran at 1 site in Italy.
Its stated primary purpose is treatment.
What Was Measured
Researchers chose this as the main measure: Operative time (minutes) (time frame: At the time of skin closure at the end of the myomectomy).
It also tracked 3 secondary outcomes, for example Difficulty of leiomyoma enucleation assessed by surgeon on a VAS scale, Intraoperative blood loss (delta Hb) and Post-operative evaluation of leiomyomas characteristics.
What This Means in Plain Language
Put simply, this is a phase 4, randomized trial of Leuprolide in 42 people with cellulite.
Its status is unknown; no results are posted to the registry yet, so nothing here describes outcomes.
More context: the Leuprolide compound page, Cellulite research.
Our Notes on the Compound
Leuprolide: A 9-amino-acid GnRH analog (Lupron, Eligard) that lowers sex-hormone levels with ongoing use; used in prostate cancer, endometriosis and early puberty.
Related Pages
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.