← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Glucagon-like Peptide-1 and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Women With Angina Pectoris and no Coronary Stenosis
Plain-language guide to NCT02602600: phase 4 interventional trial of Liraglutide, 33 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.
Key Facts
- Registry ID
- NCT02602600
- Phase
- phase 4
- Status
- completed
- Start
- 2015-11-19
- Completion (planned or actual)
- 2017-04-18
- Participants
- 33 (actual)
- Design
- na, open label (everyone knows who gets what), treatment
- Conditions studied
- Microvascular Angina
- Results posted
- not yet
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
This registered phase 4 trial tested Liraglutide.
The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of treatment with Liraglutide on the coronary microvasculature and angina symptoms, in overweight patients with microvascular dysfunction and angina pectoris but no coronary artery stenosis.
It had 1 arm (groups): Liraglutide (experimental).
The registry classes the interventions as drug.
More on the Plan
Background: Patients with symptoms and signs of ischemia are referred to coronary angiography (CAG) or CT angiography (CT-CAG).
Abnormal coronary flow and metabolic response to stress have been reported, which is consistent with a possible microvascular ethology for the symptoms.
Both endothelium- and non-endothelium dependent impaired coronary reactivity may contribute.
The endothelium dependent component has been linked to risk factors and pro-inflammatory processes promoting atherosclerosis.
Who Took Part
Enrollment: 33 actual participants took part.
It was open to women only aged from 40 years up to 75 years.
Healthy volunteers were not accepted; participants needed the condition being studied.
Examples of who could join: Women aged 40-75 with angina-like symptoms assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). Women aged 40-75 with angina-like symptoms assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). Impaired CFR assessed by echo Doppler flow (defined ratio≤2,5).
The full record lists 5 inclusion and 25 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: allergy to dipyridamole, theophyllamine or liraglutide; previous myocardial infarction or revascularization; no episodes of chest pain within 6 months before inclusion.
How the Study Was Run
The set-up was single-group and open-label.
Being open-label, the Liraglutide study did not mask who received what.
Everyone received the same intervention, so there was no separate comparison group inside the trial.
It started in 2015-11-19 with completion listed for 2017-04-18.
It ran at 1 site in Denmark.
Its stated primary purpose is treatment.
What Was Measured
The main thing measured (primary outcome): Change from baseline in Coronary Flow Reserve (time frame: Assessed at baseline, week 4 and week 18). Change from baseline in Angina Symptoms (time frame: Assessed at baseline, week 4 and week 18).
It also tracked 4 secondary outcomes, for example Change in endothelial function, Change in cardiac function, Change in body weight and Change in body composition.
What This Means in Plain Language
Put simply, this is a phase 4 trial of Liraglutide in 33 people.
Its size is small, so on its own it can only give an early look.
The trial is marked completed; no results are posted to the registry yet, so nothing here describes outcomes.
More context: the Liraglutide compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compound
Liraglutide: A once-daily GLP-1 receptor agonist peptide; sold as Victoza for type 2 diabetes and Saxenda for weight management.
Related Pages
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.