← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Effect of GLP-1 on Angiogenesis
Plain-language guide to NCT02686177: phase 4 randomized trial of Liraglutide, 50 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.
Key Facts
- Registry ID
- NCT02686177
- Phase
- phase 4
- Status
- completed
- Start
- 2016-05-18
- Completion (planned or actual)
- 2017-08-08
- Participants
- 50 (actual)
- Design
- randomized, open label (everyone knows who gets what), treatment
- Conditions studied
- Type 2 Diabetes
- Results posted
- not yet
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
The trial (phase 4) is built around Liraglutide.
Few studies have properly addressed the role of GLP-1-based therapies in regulating vascular integrity and angiogenesis.
It had two arms (groups): 1: Liraglutide (experimental) and 2: Add on oral antidiabetic medication (active comparator).
Metformin or sulfonylurea depending on monotherapy.
The registry classes the interventions as drug.
More on the Plan
T2D patients treated with GLP-1 analogs may suffer from microvascular complications such as macular oedema and proliferative retinopathy, characterized by excessive retinal angiogenesis.
The role of GLP-1 on endothelial cell (EC) growth, EC integrity and angiogenesis thus needs to be characterized.
Their aim is to provide the proof of concept that agonists of GLP-1 regulate angiogenesis in humans and identify the underlying mechanisms.
Who Took Part
50 actual participants took part.
It was open to people of any sex aged from 18 years with no upper age limit.
Healthy volunteers were not accepted; participants needed the condition being studied.
Examples of who could join: Type 2 diabetic patients (ADA criteria). Age \> 18 years. Obesity (BMI \>= 25 kg/m2). Treatment with Metformin and/or secretagogues.
The full record lists 6 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: treatment with exenatide, liraglutide or other incretinergic regimen (\<1 month before recruitment); type 1 diabetes; acute disease or infection.
How the Study Was Run
The set-up was randomized, parallel-group and open-label.
The participants were allocated by chance, so the Liraglutide group and the comparison group should start out alike.
The Liraglutide group and the comparison group ran side by side rather than switching.
Everyone knew when Liraglutide was being given (open label), which is simpler to run but leaves more room for expectations to affect what is reported.
It started in 2016-05-18 with completion listed for 2017-08-08.
It ran at 1 site in France.
Its stated primary purpose is treatment.
What Was Measured
The main thing measured (primary outcome): Difference of ANGPTL4 concentration at 4 weeks of treatment from baseline in Liraglutide and control group (time frame: At 1 month).
It also tracked 4 secondary outcomes, for example Difference of ANGPT2 concentration at 4 weeks of treatment from baseline in Liraglutide and control group and Difference of AngiomiR-126 expression at 4 weeks of treatment from baseline in Liraglutide and control group.
What This Means in Plain Language
Put simply, this is a phase 4, randomized trial of Liraglutide in 50 people.
The trial is marked completed; no results are posted to the registry yet, so nothing here describes outcomes.
More context: the Liraglutide compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compound
Liraglutide: A once-daily GLP-1 receptor agonist peptide; sold as Victoza for type 2 diabetes and Saxenda for weight management.
Related Pages
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.