← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies

Intranasal Oxytocin and Maternal Neglect

Plain-language guide to NCT02737436: not phased randomized trial of Oxytocin, 132 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.

Key Facts

Registry ID
NCT02737436
Phase
not phased
Status
completed
Start
2010-05
Completion (planned or actual)
2019-03
Participants
132 (actual)
Design
randomized, double-blind, basic_science
Conditions studied
Maternal Behavior
Results posted
yes

What This Study Did, in Plain Language

What Was Tested

In this not phased trial, researchers set out to test Oxytocin.

The investigators plan to conduct functional MRI scanning with a group of mothers who are blindly and randomly assigned either intranasal oxytocin or a placebo.

The purpose of this investigation is to explore how oxytocin may modify early maternal brain and behavioral responses to infant cues.

It had two arms (groups): Oxytocin (experimental) and Placebo (experimental).

Intranasal placebo spray given 50 minutes prior to behavior assessment or scanning.

The registry classes the interventions as drug and procedure.

More on the Plan

The investigators plan to conduct fMRI scanning with a group of mothers who are blindly and randomly assigned either intranasal oxytocin or a placebo.

Aim 1: To determine whether intranasal oxytocin (IN-OT) affects parental brain responses to infant cues, as measured during functional MRI (fMRI) scanning.

Aim 2: To determine whether IN-OT affects parental behavioral responses to infant cues, as measured by videotaped parent-infant interaction procedures.

Aim 3: To determine whether attachment security interacts with the effect of IN-OT on maternal brain and behavioral responses to infant cues.

Who Took Part

132 actual participants took part.

It was open to people of any sex aged from 20 years up to 45 years.

Healthy volunteers could join, not only people with the condition.

Examples of who could join: Be first-time parent(s). Who have just delivered a term infant \>37 weeks gestation, without medical complications. Aged between 20 and 45 years;. And be English speaking from childhood (required for accurate coding of attachment interview). Have female partners who just delivered a term infant \>37 weeks gestation, without medical complications;.

The full record lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: history of head injury resulting in loss of consciousness for \>10 minutes;; neurological disease, including stroke, brain tumor, meningitis or encephalitis;; any contraindications to mri scanning, e.g. pacemakers, aneurysm clips, neurostimulators, fixed hearing devices, metal in eyes, or other implants;.

How the Study Was Run

The set-up was randomized, crossover and double-blind.

Random assignment meant chance, not the researchers, decided who got Oxytocin and who got the comparison, which limits bias.

Each person switched between Oxytocin and the comparison at some point, usually with a gap in between.

Neither the participants nor the staff measuring them knew who was on Oxytocin, so expectations could not easily colour the readings.

Those kept unaware of assignments: participant and investigator.

It started in 2010-05 with completion listed for 2019-03.

It ran at 2 sites in United States (2).

Its stated primary purpose is basic science.

What Was Measured

Primary outcome: Differences in Brain Activation (Blood Oxygen Level Dependent [BOLD] Signal) of Dopamine Reward Regions and Prefrontal Cortex After Intranasal Oxytocin Administration in Mothers (time frame: 30 minutes after intranasal spray is administered).

What This Means in Plain Language

Put simply, this is a not phased, randomized trial of Oxytocin in 132 people.

The trial is marked completed; results are posted on the registry, and this page does not restate them.

More context: the Oxytocin compound page, all human trials.

Our Notes on the Compound

Oxytocin: A peptide hormone with established obstetric medical uses and a less settled role in research on behavior, sexual function and appetite.

Related Pages

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.