← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Oxytocin vs. Prostaglandin for Induction of Labor in Primiparas With Prelabor Rupture of Membrane and Low Bishop
Plain-language guide to NCT02801227: phase 4 randomized trial of Oxytocin, 68 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.
Key Facts
- Registry ID
- NCT02801227
- Phase
- phase 4
- Status
- status unknown
- Start
- 2016-09
- Completion (planned or actual)
- 2017-09
- Participants
- 68 (estimated)
- Design
- randomized, open label (everyone knows who gets what), treatment
- Conditions studied
- Premature Rupture of Fetal Membranes
- Results posted
- not yet
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
The trial (phase 4) is built around Oxytocin.
The purpose of the study is to compare between oxytocin to prostaglandin (PGE2), regarding time from induction of labor (IOL) to delivery among primiparas at term with prelabor rupture of membrane (PROM) and an unfavorable cervix.
It had two arms (groups): Oxytocin (experimental) and Prostaglandin E2 (experimental).
The registry classes the interventions as drug.
More on the Plan
Their secondary outcome is to compare between the groups regarding obstetric complications including: cesarean delivery, operative vaginal delivery, maternal intrapartum fever, postpartum hemorrhage, Apgar score at 5 minutes ≤ 7, PH, admission to NICU and the time from initiation of induction to active labor.
The study population will include primiparous at term with PROM and unfavorable bishop score (≤3).
Subsequent to confirming inclusion criteria and after receiving informed consent parturients will be randomly allocated to receive oxytocin or PGE2.
Induction with oxytocin (group 1) will be initiated by infusion of intravenous oxytocin: 2.5 mIU per minute with increments of 2.5 mIU every 20 minutes until achieving 4-5 contractions during 10 minutes.
Who Took Part
Enrollment: 68 planned participants were the target.
It was open to women only aged from 18 years up to 38 years.
Healthy volunteers could join, not only people with the condition.
How the Study Was Run
The set-up was randomized, parallel-group and open-label.
The participants were allocated by chance, so the Oxytocin group and the comparison group should start out alike.
Groups ran in parallel: each of the participants stayed in one arm throughout.
Being open-label, the Oxytocin study did not mask who received what.
It started in 2016-09 with completion listed for 2017-09.
Its stated primary purpose is treatment.
What Was Measured
The main thing measured (primary outcome): Time from induction of labor to delivery comparing between oxytocin and PGE2 among primiparas with prelabor rupture of membrane at term and low Bishop score (≤ 3) regarding the time needed to complete a vaginal delivery (time frame: up to 48 hours).
It also tracked 6 secondary outcomes, for example cesarean delivery, operative vaginal delivery, maternal intrapartum fever, postpartum hemorrhage, Apgar score at 5 minutes ≤ 7 and admission to NICU.
What This Means in Plain Language
Put simply, this is a phase 4, randomized trial of Oxytocin in 68 people.
Its status is unknown; no results are posted to the registry yet, so nothing here describes outcomes.
More context: the Oxytocin compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compound
Oxytocin: A peptide hormone with established obstetric medical uses and a less settled role in research on behavior, sexual function and appetite.
Related Pages
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.