← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies

Carbetocin Versus Oxytocin Plus Sublingual Misoprostol in the Management of Atonic Postpartum Hemorrhage

Plain-language guide to NCT03870503: not phased randomized trial of Oxytocin and Carbetocin, 135 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.

Key Facts

Registry ID
NCT03870503
Phase
not phased
Status
completed
Start
2019-04-01
Completion (planned or actual)
2021-06-30
Participants
135 (actual)
Design
randomized, quadruple-blind, treatment
Conditions studied
Postpartum Hemorrhage
Results posted
not yet

What This Study Did, in Plain Language

What Was Tested

The trial (not phased) is built around Oxytocin and Carbetocin.

It had three arms (groups): oxytocin (active comparator), oxytocin plus misoprostol (active comparator) and Carbetocin (active comparator).

The patient will be received Carbetocin 100 mic gm IV.

The registry classes the interventions as drug.

More on the Plan

The first cause of hemorrhage at the time of delivery is uterine atony; therefore, there is general agreement that active management of the third stage of labor is recommended.

Oxytocin is the most widely used uterotonic agent but has a half-life of only 4-10 min, that is why it is better administered as a continuous intravenous infusion to achieve sustained uterotonic activity.

Its prolonged uterine activity may theoretically offer advantages over oxytocin in the management of the third stage of labor.

The side-effect profile of carbetocin was not found to be different from that of Oxytocin but may prove to be advantageous when compared to Syntometrine.

Who Took Part

Enrollment: 135 actual participants took part.

It was open to women only aged from 20 years up to 40 years.

Healthy volunteers were not accepted; participants needed the condition being studied.

The full record lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: gestational age\<37 weeks,; genital tract trauma,; coagulation defect,.

How the Study Was Run

It was run as a randomized, parallel-group and quadruple-blind study.

Random assignment meant chance, not the researchers, decided who got Oxytocin and who got the comparison, which limits bias.

The Oxytocin group and the comparison group ran side by side rather than switching.

As a double-blind Oxytocin study, the assignments were hidden from both participants and investigators until the end.

Those kept unaware of assignments: participant, care provider, investigator and outcomes assessor.

It started in 2019-04-01 with completion listed for 2021-06-30.

It ran at 1 site in Egypt.

Its stated primary purpose is treatment.

What Was Measured

The main thing measured (primary outcome): The amount of blood loss (time frame: 6 hours post delivery).

It also tracked 2 secondary outcomes, for example The number of patient need blood transfusion.

What This Means in Plain Language

Put simply, this is a not phased, randomized trial of Oxytocin and Carbetocin in 135 people.

The trial is marked completed; no results are posted to the registry yet, so nothing here describes outcomes.

More context: the Oxytocin compound page and the Carbetocin compound page, all human trials.

Our Notes on the Compounds

Oxytocin: A peptide hormone with established obstetric medical uses and a less settled role in research on behavior, sexual function and appetite.

Carbetocin: A long-acting oxytocin analog used outside the US to prevent bleeding after childbirth; also studied intranasally in Prader-Willi syndrome.

Related Pages

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.