← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Oxytocin at Elective Cesarean Deliveries: A Dose-finding Study in Women With Twin Pregnancy
Plain-language guide to NCT04025658: not phased randomized trial of Oxytocin, 30 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.
Key Facts
- Registry ID
- NCT04025658
- Phase
- not phased
- Status
- completed
- Start
- 2019-08-06
- Completion (planned or actual)
- 2021-09-07
- Participants
- 30 (actual)
- Design
- randomized, quadruple-blind, treatment
- Conditions studied
- Postpartum Hemorrhage; Twin
- Results posted
- not yet
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
This registered not phased trial tested Oxytocin.
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) due to uterine atony is a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality.
It had six arms (groups): one (active comparator), one (active comparator), one (active comparator), one (active comparator) and one (active comparator).
The registry classes the interventions as drug.
More on the Plan
Multiple pregnancy is a well-recognized risk factor for PPH.
This is true in both high- and low-income countries.
Uterine atony as a cause of PPH is more likely in multiple pregnancy compared with singleton pregnancy.
Who Took Part
30 actual participants took part.
It was open to women only aged from 18 years up to 50 years.
Healthy volunteers could join, not only people with the condition.
Examples of who could join: Elective cesarean delivery under regional anesthesia. Gestational age ≥36 weeks. No known additional risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage. Written informed consent to participate in this study.
The full record lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: refusal to give written informed consent; allergy or hypersensitivity to oxytocin; hepatic, renal, and vascular disease.
How the Study Was Run
The set-up was randomized, parallel-group and quadruple-blind.
Random assignment meant chance, not the researchers, decided who got Oxytocin and who got the comparison, which limits bias.
The Oxytocin group and the comparison group ran side by side rather than switching.
Blinding on both sides kept the participants and researchers unaware of who received Oxytocin.
Those kept unaware of assignments: participant, care provider, investigator and outcomes assessor.
It started in 2019-08-06 with completion listed for 2021-09-07.
It ran at 1 site in Canada.
Its stated primary purpose is treatment.
What Was Measured
The main thing measured (primary outcome): Uterine tone 2 minutes: questionnaire (time frame: 3 minutes).
It also tracked 16 secondary outcomes, for example Need for uterine massage: questionnaire, Intraoperative requirement for additional uterotonic medication, Calculated estimate of blood loss, Intravenous fluid administered during surgery, Presence of ventricular tachycardia: ECG and Presence of atrial fibrillation: ECG.
What This Means in Plain Language
Put simply, this is a not phased, randomized trial of Oxytocin in 30 people.
Its size is small, so on its own it can only give an early look.
The trial is marked completed; no results are posted to the registry yet, so nothing here describes outcomes.
More context: the Oxytocin compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compound
Oxytocin: A peptide hormone with established obstetric medical uses and a less settled role in research on behavior, sexual function and appetite.
Related Pages
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.