← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies

The Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity Study Comparing an Insulin Glargine Biosimilar Sansulin Log-G to Lantus

Plain-language guide to NCT04591457: phase 2 randomized trial of Insulin Glargine, 120 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.

Key Facts

Registry ID
NCT04591457
Phase
phase 2
Status
status unknown
Start
2020-10
Completion (planned or actual)
2021-08
Participants
120 (estimated)
Design
randomized, single-blind, treatment
Conditions studied
Diabetes Mellitus
Results posted
not yet

What This Study Did, in Plain Language

What Was Tested

The trial (phase 2) is built around Insulin Glargine.

It had two arms (groups): Insulin Glargine Sansulin (experimental) and Insulin Glargine Lantus (active comparator).

The registry classes the interventions as drug.

More on the Plan

Sansulin® Log-G is an insulin glargine biosimilar.

Immunogenicity assessment should always be done because it is influenced by so many factors, from nature of the drug substance until patient and disease related factors.

Moreover its consequences also vary considerably, from clinically irrelevant to serious and life-threatening.

Immunogenicity of a biosimilar should always be investigated in humans, since animal data are usually not predictive of the immune response in humans.

Who Took Part

Enrollment: 120 planned participants were the target.

It was open to people of any sex aged from 18 years with no upper age limit.

Healthy volunteers were not accepted; participants needed the condition being studied.

Examples of who could join: Patients with DM type 2, age at least 18 years, both genders. Patients who are cooperative, reliable, and agree to have regular injections of insulin, and are willing to comply with protocol procedure (willing to sign the informed consent).

The full record lists 4 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: pregnancy (confirmed by a positive urine pregnancy test) or lactation; history of diabetic ketoacidosis \> 2x within the last year; having hyperglycemia hyperosmolar status (hhs).

How the Study Was Run

Design: randomized, parallel-group and single-blind.

Random assignment meant chance, not the researchers, decided who got Insulin Glargine and who got the comparison, which limits bias.

Groups ran in parallel: each of the participants stayed in one arm throughout.

In this single-blind Insulin Glargine study one party knew the assignments and the other did not.

Those kept unaware of assignments: participant.

It started in 2020-10 with completion listed for 2021-08.

It ran at 1 site in Indonesia.

Its stated primary purpose is treatment.

What Was Measured

The main thing measured (primary outcome): HbA1c (time frame: 24 weeks). Number of patients (time frame: 24 weeks). Anti-insulin antibodies (AIAs) (time frame: 24 weeks).

It also tracked 4 secondary outcomes, for example FBG & PPBG, Hypoglycemia, Weight gain and Adverse events.

What This Means in Plain Language

Put simply, this is a phase 2, randomized trial of Insulin Glargine in 120 people.

Its status is unknown; no results are posted to the registry yet, so nothing here describes outcomes.

More context: the Insulin Glargine compound page, all human trials.

Our Notes on the Compound

Insulin Glargine: A long-acting insulin analog given once daily; brands include Lantus, Toujeo, Basaglar and Semglee.

Related Pages

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.