← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Comparison of Insulin Glargine and Regular Insulin Versus NPH and Regular Insulin in the Treatment of T1DM
Plain-language guide to NCT05709938: phase 4 randomized trial of Insulin Glargine, 68 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.
Key Facts
- Registry ID
- NCT05709938
- Phase
- phase 4
- Status
- completed
- Start
- 2019-11-01
- Completion (planned or actual)
- 2021-01-05
- Participants
- 68 (actual)
- Design
- randomized, open label (everyone knows who gets what), treatment
- Conditions studied
- To Assess the Glycemic Control of Insulin Glargine in Combination With Regular Insulin in Type 1 Diabetes in Children
- Results posted
- not yet
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
The trial (phase 4) is built around Insulin Glargine.
To compare the glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes using insulin Glargine and regular insulin as basal bolus therapy versus Neutral Protamine Hagedorn insulin (NPH) and regular insulin.
It had two arms (groups): Glargine (experimental) and NPH (active comparator).
Glargine-regular insulin regimen.
NPH- regular insulin regimen.
The registry classes the interventions as drug.
More on the Plan
Diagnosed patients with Type-1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), who had been on insulin therapy for more than three months, and met the eligibility criteria, were enrolled and randomly divided into group A and group B using the lottery method performed by the nursing staff.
Baseline HbA1c level was done for all the patients using CERA-STAT 2000 analyzer.
The funding from KEMU was used to arrange insulin glargine and glucometer strips.
Patients and their guardians were taught how to use the glucometer and record the measurements on monitoring sheets.
Who Took Part
The registry lists 68 actual participants took part.
It was open to people of any sex aged from 3 years up to 18 years.
Healthy volunteers were not accepted; participants needed the condition being studied.
Examples of who could join: Children of age 3 to 18 years with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.
The full record lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: children below or above 18 years; comorbidities like celiac disease, hypothyroidism.
How the Study Was Run
The set-up was randomized, parallel-group and open-label.
Random assignment meant chance, not the researchers, decided who got Insulin Glargine and who got the comparison, which limits bias.
Groups ran in parallel: each of the participants stayed in one arm throughout.
Nothing was hidden in this open-label Insulin Glargine study: the participants and staff both knew the treatment.
It started in 2019-11-01 with completion listed for 2021-01-05.
It ran at 1 site in Pakistan.
Its stated primary purpose is treatment.
What Was Measured
The main thing measured (primary outcome): HbA1c (time frame: Three months). Hypoglycemia (time frame: Three months). Fasting blood sugar (time frame: Three months).
What This Means in Plain Language
Put simply, this is a phase 4, randomized trial of Insulin Glargine in 68 people.
The trial is marked completed; no results are posted to the registry yet, so nothing here describes outcomes.
More context: the Insulin Glargine compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compound
Insulin Glargine: A long-acting insulin analog given once daily; brands include Lantus, Toujeo, Basaglar and Semglee.
Related Pages
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.