← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin for Induction of Labour in Parturients With Spontaneous Rupture of Fetal Membranes at Term
Plain-language guide to NCT06343480: not phased randomized trial of Oxytocin, 120 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.
Key Facts
- Registry ID
- NCT06343480
- Phase
- not phased
- Status
- completed
- Start
- 2020-09-01
- Completion (planned or actual)
- 2021-08-31
- Participants
- 120 (actual)
- Design
- randomized, triple-blind, treatment
- Conditions studied
- Labor Onset and Length Abnormalities
- Results posted
- not yet
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
This registered not phased trial tested Oxytocin.
It had two arms (groups): first arm - Oxytocin titration (active comparator) and second arm - Misoprostol give sublingual (active comparator).
The registry classes the interventions as drug.
More on the Plan
The ideal method of induction of labour for term PROM is a subject of controversy.
The primary outcome measure was the mean induction delivery interval.
The secondary outcome measures were Caesarean section rate, the incidence of uterine hyper-stimulation, tachysystole or hypertonus, APGAR scores at the first and fifth minute and NICU admission.
Data analysis was done using statistical Package for Social Science (IBM SPSS) software (version 20, Chicago IL, USA).
Who Took Part
Enrollment: 120 actual participants took part.
It was open to women only aged from 15 years up to 44 years.
Healthy volunteers were not accepted; participants needed the condition being studied.
Examples of who could join: Signed informed consent. Singleton pregnancy at term. Prelabour rupture of membranes. Not having contraction. Bishop scoe 5 or less.
The full record lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: prelabour rupture of membranes at less than term; declined consent; contraindication for vaginal delivery.
How the Study Was Run
It was run as a randomized, parallel-group and triple-blind study.
Random assignment meant chance, not the researchers, decided who got Oxytocin and who got the comparison, which limits bias.
The Oxytocin group and the comparison group ran side by side rather than switching.
As a double-blind Oxytocin study, the assignments were hidden from both participants and investigators until the end.
Those kept unaware of assignments: participant, care provider and investigator.
It started in 2020-09-01 with completion listed for 2021-08-31.
It ran at 2 sites in Nigeria (2).
Its stated primary purpose is treatment.
What Was Measured
Researchers chose this as the main measure: Mean induction delivery interval (time frame: During the delivery).
What This Means in Plain Language
Put simply, this is a not phased, randomized trial of Oxytocin in 120 people.
The trial is marked completed; no results are posted to the registry yet, so nothing here describes outcomes.
More context: the Oxytocin compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compound
Oxytocin: A peptide hormone with established obstetric medical uses and a less settled role in research on behavior, sexual function and appetite.
Related Pages
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.