← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Comparison of Pregnancy Rates in Modified Natural Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET) Cycle After Luteal Support with GnRH Agonist Versus Progesterone
Plain-language guide to NCT06870266: early phase 1 randomized trial of Nafarelin, 150 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.
Key Facts
- Registry ID
- NCT06870266
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Status
- not yet recruiting
- Start
- 2025-03
- Completion (planned or actual)
- 2027-03
- Participants
- 150 (estimated)
- Design
- randomized, open label (everyone knows who gets what), treatment
- Conditions studied
- Ivf; Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET)
- Results posted
- not yet
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
The trial (early phase 1) is built around Nafarelin.
Endogenous progesterone from the corpus luteum, following frozen embryo transfer in natural or modified natural cycles, is expected to provide sufficient luteal support, as observed in spontaneous pregnancies.
It had two arms (groups): SYNAREL (active comparator) and UTEROGESTAN (active comparator).
The registry classes the interventions as drug.
More on the Plan
Background: The ability to transfer frozen embryos allows for the storage of embryos created during in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments for later use.
There are several methods for preparing the endometrium for frozen embryo transfer: 1.
Natural Cycle (NC) - Timing ovulation by detecting the LH surge.
However, its disadvantages include the need for close monitoring to detect ovulation and the inflexibility of embryo transfer timing, leading to a higher rate of cycle cancellations. 2.
Who Took Part
150 planned participants were the target.
It was open to women only aged from 18 years up to 40 years.
Healthy volunteers were not accepted; participants needed the condition being studied.
Examples of who could join: Women undergoing frozen embryo transfer in a modified natural cycle.
The full record lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: women undergoing medicated fet cycles; BMI \>35 or \<18; women with hydrosalpinx.
How the Study Was Run
It was run as a randomized, parallel-group and open-label study.
Random assignment meant chance, not the researchers, decided who got Nafarelin and who got the comparison, which limits bias.
The Nafarelin group and the comparison group ran side by side rather than switching.
Nothing was hidden in this open-label Nafarelin study: the participants and staff both knew the treatment.
It started in 2025-03 with completion listed for 2027-03.
Its stated primary purpose is treatment.
What Was Measured
Researchers chose this as the main measure: clinical pregnancy rate (time frame: two months after ET).
It also tracked 4 secondary outcomes, for example positive pregancny, implantation rate, live birth rate and miscarriage rate.
What This Means in Plain Language
Put simply, this is a early phase 1, randomized trial of Nafarelin in 150 people.
Its status is not yet recruiting; no results are posted to the registry yet, so nothing here describes outcomes.
More context: the Nafarelin compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compound
Nafarelin: A GnRH analog nasal spray (Synarel) used in endometriosis and early puberty.
Related Pages
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.