← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Oxytocin Bolus Versus Infusion in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section (INBOX-HR)
Plain-language guide to NCT07688512: phase 4 randomized trial of Oxytocin, 180 participants. Who took part, design and what was measured.
Key Facts
- Registry ID
- NCT07688512
- Phase
- phase 4
- Status
- not yet recruiting
- Start
- 2026-08
- Completion (planned or actual)
- 2028-08
- Participants
- 180 (estimated)
- Design
- randomized, triple-blind, other
- Conditions studied
- Postpartum Hemorrhage; Uterine Atony; Uterine Atony With Hemorrhage; Elective Cesarean Section
- Results posted
- not yet
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
In this phase 4 trial, researchers set out to test Oxytocin.
The main questions that will be answered are: 1.
It had two arms (groups): Oxytocin Bolus (active comparator) and Oxytocin Infusion (active comparator).
The registry classes the interventions as drug.
More on the Plan
However, the optimal strategy for oxytocin administration remains controversial.
Which makes the most logical next question: Does bolus oxytocin become more clinically meaningful in patients with higher baseline risk for uterine atony or hemorrhage.
The investigators aim to address this question with the INBOX-HR study.
INBOX-HR acts as a continuing investigation on the difference between bolus versus infusion administration of oxytocin, specifically for patients that are at a high risk for postpartum hemorrhage.
Who Took Part
Enrollment: 180 planned participants were the target.
It was open to women only aged from 18 years up to 45 years.
Healthy volunteers were not accepted; participants needed the condition being studied.
Examples of who could join: Undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia or combined spinal anesthesia (CSE). Patients must be able to provide written informed consent in either English or Spanish. Parturient classified as high risk for postpartum hemorrhage as defined by the adapted California Maternal Quality Care Obstetric Hemorrhage Risk Screen.
The full record lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria; among the exclusions: parturient in labor or ruptured membranes; patient does not possess the physical and mental capacity to provide informed consent; urgent or emergent cesarean sections.
How the Study Was Run
It was run as a randomized, parallel-group and triple-blind study.
Random assignment meant chance, not the researchers, decided who got Oxytocin and who got the comparison, which limits bias.
Groups ran in parallel: each of the participants stayed in one arm throughout.
As a double-blind Oxytocin study, the assignments were hidden from both participants and investigators until the end.
Those kept unaware of assignments: participant, care provider and investigator.
It started in 2026-08 with completion listed for 2028-08.
Its stated primary purpose is other.
What Was Measured
The main thing measured (primary outcome): Time to uterine tone (time frame: 2 minutes after umbilical cord clamp until 10 minutes).
It also tracked 8 secondary outcomes, for example Estimated intraoperative blood loss, Changes in heart rate (beats per minute), Changes in blood pressure (mmHg), Participants with need for additional uterotonic agents, 0-10 Uterine tone score and Participants with maternal side effects.
What This Means in Plain Language
Put simply, this is a phase 4, randomized trial of Oxytocin in 180 people.
Its status is not yet recruiting; no results are posted to the registry yet, so nothing here describes outcomes.
More context: the Oxytocin compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compound
Oxytocin: A peptide hormone with established obstetric medical uses and a less settled role in research on behavior, sexual function and appetite.
Related Pages
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.