← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin II receptor antagonist and calcium antagonist on urinary podocytes in patients with IgA nephropathy.
Plain-language guide to PMID 11092994 (2000): randomized controlled trial of Verapamil in 32 patients.
Key Facts
- PMID
- 11092994
- Journal
- American journal of nephrology
- Year
- 2000
- Study type
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Authors
- Nakamura T et al. (8 authors)
- DOI
- 10.1159/000013619
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
This randomized controlled trial looks at Verapamil.
The aim of the present study is to assess whether verapamil, trandolapril and candesartan cilexetil affect proteinuria and urinary podocytes in patients with IgA nephropathy.
Why It Was Studied
The urinary podocyte is postulated to be a marker for estimation of the severity of active glomerular injury and a predictor of disease progression in children with glomerulonephritis.
Twenty patients with diffuse mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis (non-IgA PGN) and 20 healthy controls were also included in this study.
Who Took Part
According to the abstract, 32 patients were involved.
The age groups tagged for this paper are adults and middle-aged adults, both men and women.
How the Study Was Run
The researchers set it up as a randomized and placebo-controlled study.
Because people in this Verapamil study were split into groups at random, differences between the groups are less likely to reflect who happened to join each one.
Some patients received a placebo instead of Verapamil, giving a reference point.
What Was Measured
PubMed files the paper under topics including Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Benzimidazoles, Biphenyl Compounds, Calcium Channel Blockers, Glomerular Mesangium and Glomerulonephritis, IGA.
What This Means in Plain Language
The paper is a randomized and placebo-controlled study of Verapamil in 32 patients.
With fewer than 40 people, it is a small study, so it is better read as an early signal for further research than as a settled answer.
The publication is from 2000 (American journal of nephrology), a journal based in Switzerland.
More context: all human trials.
Related Pages
Source: PubMed record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.