← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
The effect of an herbal dietary supplement containing ephedrine and caffeine on oxygen consumption in humans.
Plain-language guide to PMID 11152061 (2000): double-blind randomized controlled trial of Caffeine and Ephedrine.
Key Facts
- PMID
- 11152061
- Journal
- Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)
- Year
- 2000
- Study type
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Authors
- Greenway FL et al. (3 authors)
- DOI
- 10.1089/acm.2000.6.553
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
Researchers studied Caffeine and Ephedrine in this randomized controlled trial publication.
Who Took Part
PubMed tags the participants as women only.
Measurement of peak oxygen consumption in response to the supplement followed by a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover measurement of oxygen consumption in response to the supplement.
How the Study Was Run
The design is described as randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and crossover.
Because people in this Caffeine study were split into groups at random, differences between the groups are less likely to reflect who happened to join each one.
Neither the participants nor the staff measuring them knew who was on Caffeine, so expectations could not easily colour the readings.
Some participants received a placebo instead of Caffeine, giving a reference point.
Each person switched between Caffeine and the comparison at some point, usually with a gap in between.
The study was conducted in an academic research clinic.
Ten obese females (aged 41 +/- 4 years [body mass index (BMI)] 33.3 +/- 2.6 kg/m2) participated in the peak oxygen consumption test; six of these females participated in the crossover trial.
What Was Measured
PubMed files the paper under topics including Caffeine, Dietary Supplements, Ephedrine, Obesity, Oxygen Consumption, Plant Extracts and Weight Loss.
What This Means in Plain Language
The paper is a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study of Caffeine and Ephedrine.
Results are reported in around 5 sentences of the abstract; we leave them to the paper itself rather than summarise them.
The publication is from 2000 (Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)), a journal based in United States.
More context: all human trials.
Related Pages
Source: PubMed record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.