← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Beneficial effects of a soy-based dietary supplement on lipid levels and cardiovascular risk markers in type 2 diabetic subjects.
Plain-language guide to PMID 11213870 (2001): double-blind randomized controlled trial of Dietary Proteins in 2 subjects.
Key Facts
- PMID
- 11213870
- Journal
- Diabetes care
- Year
- 2001
- Study type
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Authors
- Hermansen K et al. (5 authors)
- DOI
- 10.2337/diacare.24.2.228
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
This randomized controlled trial looks at Dietary Proteins.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate if a dietary supplement of soy protein, isoflavones, and cotyledon fiber (Abalon) affects cardiovascular risk markers, blood glucose, and insulin levels in type 2 diabetic subjects.
Who Took Part
The abstract describes 2 subjects taking part.
The age groups tagged for this paper are middle-aged adults and older adults, both men and women.
Twenty type 2 diabetic subjects participated in a crossover trial.
How the Study Was Run
The design is described as randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and crossover.
Random assignment meant chance, not the researchers, decided who got Dietary Proteins and who got the comparison, which limits bias.
As a double-blind Dietary Proteins study, the assignments were hidden from both participants and investigators until the end.
Some subjects received a placebo instead of Dietary Proteins, giving a reference point.
Each person switched between Dietary Proteins and the comparison at some point, usually with a gap in between.
What Was Measured
The subject headings attached to it are Apolipoprotein B-100, Apolipoproteins B, Blood Glucose, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.
What This Means in Plain Language
The paper is a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study of Dietary Proteins in 2 subjects.
With fewer than 40 people, it is a small study, so it is better read as an early signal for further research than as a settled answer.
Results are reported in around 5 sentences of the abstract; we leave them to the paper itself rather than summarise them.
The publication is from 2001 (Diabetes care), a journal based in United States.
More context: all human trials.
Related Pages
Source: PubMed record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.