← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Intravenous magnesium sulfate for bronchial hyperreactivity: a randomized, controlled, double-blind study.
Plain-language guide to PMID 11372005 (2001): double-blind randomized controlled trial of Magnesium Sulfate in 30 subjects.
Key Facts
- PMID
- 11372005
- Journal
- Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
- Year
- 2001
- Study type
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Authors
- Schenk P et al. (6 authors)
- DOI
- 10.1067/mcp.2001.114926
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
This randomized controlled trial looks at Magnesium Sulfate.
The researchers performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the effect of intravenous magnesium sulfate on bronchial reactivity to metacholine in 30 subjects with bronchial hyperreactivity.
Why It Was Studied
Conflicting data exist concerning the effect of magnesium on bronchial hyperreactivity.
Who Took Part
The abstract describes 30 subjects taking part.
The age groups tagged for this paper are adults, both men and women.
How the Study Was Run
The researchers set it up as a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study.
The subjects were allocated by chance, so the Magnesium Sulfate group and the comparison group should start out alike.
Blinding on both sides kept the subjects and researchers unaware of who received Magnesium Sulfate.
The comparison arm used a placebo, so changes seen with Magnesium Sulfate could be set against what happens without it.
Metacholine provocation was repeated 30 minutes after the initiation of the magnesium or placebo infusion.
What Was Measured
Topics PubMed links to this paper include Analgesics, Bronchial Hyperreactivity, Bronchial Provocation Tests, Magnesium Sulfate and Respiratory Function Tests.
What This Means in Plain Language
The paper is a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study of Magnesium Sulfate in 30 subjects.
With fewer than 40 people, it is a small study, so it is better read as an early signal for further research than as a settled answer.
The abstract goes on to report its results in about 4 sentences; this page does not restate them, so read the paper for the findings and their limits.
The publication is from 2001 (Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics), a journal based in United States.
More context: all human trials.
Related Pages
Source: PubMed record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.