← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
A randomised trial to investigate the efficacy of magnesium sulphate for refractory ventricular fibrillation.
Plain-language guide to PMID 11777881 (2002): double-blind randomized controlled trial of Anti-Arrhythmia Agents.
Key Facts
- PMID
- 11777881
- Journal
- Emergency medicine journal : EMJ
- Year
- 2002
- Study type
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Authors
- Hassan TB et al. (3 authors)
- DOI
- 10.1136/emj.19.1.57
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
Researchers studied Anti-Arrhythmia Agents in this randomized controlled trial publication.
Ventricular fibrillation (VF) remains the most salvageable rhythm in patients suffering a cardiopulmonary arrest (CA).
However, outcome remains poor if there is no response to initial defibrillation.
Who Took Part
By PubMed's age tags, the people studied were middle-aged adults, older adults and people over 80, both men and women.
SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTION: Patients in CA with refractory or recurrent VF treated in the prehospital phase by the county emergency medical services and/or in the A&E department.
How the Study Was Run
The design is described as randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled.
Random assignment meant chance, not the researchers, decided who got Anti-Arrhythmia Agents and who got the comparison, which limits bias.
Blinding on both sides kept the participants and researchers unaware of who received Anti-Arrhythmia Agents.
The comparison arm used a placebo, so changes seen with Anti-Arrhythmia Agents could be set against what happens without it.
A randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial.
Pre-defined primary and secondary endpoints were ROSC at the scene or in accident and emergency (A&E) and discharge from hospital alive respectively.
What Was Measured
However, outcome remains poor if there is no response to initial defibrillation.
Topics PubMed links to this paper include Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Heart Arrest, Logistic Models, Magnesium Sulfate, Recurrence and Ventricular Fibrillation.
What This Means in Plain Language
The paper is a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study of Anti-Arrhythmia Agents.
Its findings take up roughly 7 sentences of the abstract and are left out here on purpose; the source paper is the place to read them.
The publication is from 2002 (Emergency medicine journal : EMJ), a journal based in England.
More context: all human trials.
Related Pages
Source: PubMed record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.