← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies

Oral zinc sulphate in the treatment of recalcitrant viral warts: randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Plain-language guide to PMID 11952542 (2002): randomized controlled trial of Astringents in 40 patients.

Key Facts

PMID
11952542
Journal
The British journal of dermatology
Year
2002
Study type
Randomized Controlled Trial
Authors
Al-Gurairi FT et al. (3 authors)
DOI
10.1046/j.1365-2133.2002.04617.x

What This Study Did, in Plain Language

What Was Tested

Researchers studied Astringents in this randomized controlled trial publication.

Viral warts are common dermatological diseases; although the rate of spontaneous recovery is high, it usually takes a long time, and some patients might not show this spontaneous healing.

Zinc has an important effect on the immune system and it has been used as an immunomodulator to treat a variety of skin disorders.

Who Took Part

According to the abstract, 40 patients were involved.

The age groups tagged for this paper are young children, children, teenagers, adults and middle-aged adults, both men and women.

Eighty patients with viral warts (common, plantar and plane) were all resistant to all forms of treatment.

Each patient had > 15 warts.

How the Study Was Run

The researchers set it up as a randomized and placebo-controlled study.

The patients were allocated by chance, so the Astringents group and the comparison group should start out alike.

Some patients received a placebo instead of Astringents, giving a reference point.

This was a placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Another 40 patients were given a placebo oral treatment in the form of glucose, and followed-up for the same period.

What Was Measured

Topics PubMed links to this paper include Analysis of Variance, Astringents, Chronic Disease, Nausea, Warts, Zinc and Zinc Sulfate.

What This Means in Plain Language

The paper is a randomized and placebo-controlled study of Astringents in 40 patients.

Results are reported in around 8 sentences of the abstract; we leave them to the paper itself rather than summarise them.

The publication is from 2002 (The British journal of dermatology), a journal based in England.

More context: all human trials.

Related Pages

Source: PubMed record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.