← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition but not angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonism augments coronary release of tissue plasminogen activator in hypertensive patients.
Plain-language guide to PMID 12706934 (2003): randomized controlled trial of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Losartan in 16 patients.
Key Facts
- PMID
- 12706934
- Journal
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Year
- 2003
- Study type
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Authors
- Matsumoto T et al. (11 authors)
- DOI
- 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00162-1
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
The paper reports a study of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Losartan, published as a randomized controlled trial.
The researchers compared the effects of perindopril and losartan on endothelium-dependent coronary vasomotor and fibrinolytic function.
Why It Was Studied
The renin-angiotensin system regulates the vascular fibrinolytic balance.
However, the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists on coronary fibrinolytic function have not been compared in hypertensive patients.
Who Took Part
The study group was 16 patients.
By PubMed's age tags, the people studied were middle-aged adults and older adults, both men and women.
Coronary blood flow (CBF) was evaluated by Doppler flow velocity measurement.
How the Study Was Run
In design terms this was a randomized study.
The patients were allocated by chance, so the Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors group and the comparison group should start out alike.
What Was Measured
Topics PubMed links to this paper include Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Antihypertensive Agents, Bradykinin, Coronary Circulation, Fibrinolysis and Hypertension.
What This Means in Plain Language
The paper is a randomized study of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Losartan in 16 patients.
With fewer than 40 people, it is a small study, so it is better read as an early signal for further research than as a settled answer.
The abstract goes on to report its results in about 6 sentences; this page does not restate them, so read the paper for the findings and their limits.
The publication is from 2003 (Journal of the American College of Cardiology), a journal based in United States.
More context: all human trials.
Related Pages
Source: PubMed record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.