← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
The influence of mecamylamine on trigeminal and olfactory chemoreception of nicotine.
Plain-language guide to PMID 16123771 (2006): double-blind randomized controlled trial of Therapeutic nicotine (patch, non-peptide).
Key Facts
- PMID
- 16123771
- Journal
- Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology
- Year
- 2006
- Study type
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Authors
- Thuerauf N et al. (7 authors)
- DOI
- 10.1038/sj.npp.1300842
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
This randomized controlled trial looks at Therapeutic nicotine (patch, non-peptide).
The aim of their study in humans was to investigate the effects of mecamylamine on the olfactory and the trigeminal chemoreception of nicotine enantiomers.
In order to achieve this aim, the researchers determined-before and after mecamylamine-(1) detection thresholds, trigeminal thresholds, and intensity estimates (stimulus intensity) and (2) recorded the negative mucosal potential (NMP) following nasal stimulation with nicotine in a placebo-controlled double blind study (n = 15).
Why It Was Studied
Nicotine presented to the nasal cavity at low concentrations evokes 'odorous' sensations, and at higher concentrations 'burning' and 'stinging' sensations.
Mecamylamine, a nicotinic acetylcholine-receptor-(nAch-R) antagonist, was able to block painful responses following chemical stimulation of the human tongue and to block responses from the rat's ethmoidal nerve.
Who Took Part
By PubMed's age tags, the people studied were teenagers, adults and middle-aged adults.
How the Study Was Run
The design is described as randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and crossover.
Because people in this Therapeutic nicotine (patch, non-peptide) study were split into groups at random, differences between the groups are less likely to reflect who happened to join each one.
As a double-blind Therapeutic nicotine (patch, non-peptide) study, the assignments were hidden from both participants and investigators until the end.
The comparison arm used a placebo, so changes seen with Therapeutic nicotine (patch, non-peptide) could be set against what happens without it.
In the crossover set-up each of the participants took both Therapeutic nicotine (patch, non-peptide) and the comparison in turn, acting as their own control.
What Was Measured
Topics PubMed links to this paper include Chemoreceptor Cells, Drug Interactions, Evoked Potentials, Mecamylamine, Multivariate Analysis, Nicotine and Nicotinic Antagonists.
What This Means in Plain Language
The paper is a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study of Therapeutic nicotine (patch, non-peptide).
The publication is from 2006 (Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology), a journal based in England.
More context: the Therapeutic nicotine (patch, non-peptide) compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compound
Therapeutic nicotine (patch, non-peptide): Pure nicotine as a signaling tool, separated from smoking and vaping.
Related Pages
Source: PubMed record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.