← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Inhibition of capsaicin-induced increase in dermal blood flow by the oral CGRP receptor antagonist, telcagepant (MK-0974).
Plain-language guide to PMID 20078608 (2010): randomized controlled trial of Capsaicin in 12 men.
Key Facts
- PMID
- 20078608
- Journal
- British journal of clinical pharmacology
- Year
- 2010
- Study type
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Authors
- Sinclair SR et al. (18 authors)
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03543.x
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
This randomized controlled trial looks at Capsaicin.
Plasma samples to determine telcagepant concentrations were collected immediately after laser Doppler perfusion imaging.
Who Took Part
The study group was 12 men.
The age groups tagged for this paper are teenagers, young adults, adults and middle-aged adults, men only.
A three-period crossover study in 12 healthy adult men.
Capsaicin was applied at two sites on the volar surface of the subjects' left and right forearms.
How the Study Was Run
The researchers set it up as a randomized, placebo-controlled and crossover study.
Random assignment meant chance, not the researchers, decided who got Capsaicin and who got the comparison, which limits bias.
A placebo (an inactive look-alike) gave the Capsaicin group a baseline to be compared against.
Each person switched between Capsaicin and the comparison at some point, usually with a gap in between.
DBF was assessed by laser Doppler perfusion imaging immediately before ('baseline'), and 0.5 h after each capsaicin application at 1 and 4 h.
What Was Measured
The subject headings attached to it are Administration, Topical, Azepines, Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonists, Capsaicin, Drug Interactions, Forearm and Imidazoles.
What This Means in Plain Language
The paper is a randomized, placebo-controlled and crossover study of Capsaicin in 12 men.
With fewer than 40 people, it is a small study, so it is better read as an early signal for further research than as a settled answer.
Its findings take up roughly 4 sentences of the abstract and are left out here on purpose; the source paper is the place to read them.
The publication is from 2010 (British journal of clinical pharmacology), a journal based in England.
More context: all human trials.
Related Pages
Source: PubMed record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.