← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Effect of insulin glargine and n-3FA on carotid intima-media thickness in people with dysglycemia at high risk for cardiovascular events: the glucose reduction and atherosclerosis continuing evaluation study (ORIGIN-GRACE)
Plain-language guide to PMID 23564916 (2013): double-blind randomized controlled trial study of Insulin Glargine in 1,184 people, atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease & high blood pressure.
Key Facts
- PMID
- 23564916
- Journal
- Diabetes care
- Year
- 2013
- Study type
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Authors
- Lonn EM et al. (14 authors)
- DOI
- 10.2337/dc12-2129
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
The paper reports a study of Insulin Glargine in the context of atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease & high blood pressure, published as a randomized controlled trial.
To evaluate the effects of insulin glargine and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (n-3FA) supplements on carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT).
Who Took Part
The study group was 1,184 people.
By PubMed's age tags, the people studied were middle-aged adults and older adults, both men and women.
The researchers enrolled 1,184 people with cardiovascular (CV) disease and/or CV risk factors plus impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, or early type 2 diabetes in a randomized multicenter 2 × 2 factorial design trial.
The primary trial outcome was the annualized rate of change in maximum CIMT for the common carotid, bifurcation, and internal carotid artery segments.
How the Study Was Run
The researchers set it up as a randomized, double-blind, open-label, placebo-controlled and multicenter study.
Random assignment meant chance, not the researchers, decided who got Insulin Glargine and who got the comparison, which limits bias.
Neither the people nor the staff measuring them knew who was on Insulin Glargine, so expectations could not easily colour the readings.
Nothing was hidden in this open-label Insulin Glargine study: the people and staff both knew the treatment.
The comparison arm used a placebo, so changes seen with Insulin Glargine could be set against what happens without it.
Secondary outcomes were the annualized rates of change in maximum CIMT for the common carotid and the common carotid plus bifurcation, respectively.
Baseline followed by annual ultrasounds were obtained during a median follow-up of 4.9 years.
What Was Measured
Topics PubMed links to this paper include Atherosclerosis, Blood Glucose, Carotid Intima-Media Thickness, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin Glargine and Insulin, Long-Acting.
What This Means in Plain Language
The paper is a randomized, double-blind and open-label study of Insulin Glargine in 1,184 people in people with atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease & high blood pressure.
With several hundred people or more, it is a fairly large study for this kind of research.
Results are reported in around 3 sentences of the abstract; we leave them to the paper itself rather than summarise them.
The publication is from 2013 (Diabetes care), a journal based in United States.
More context: the Insulin Glargine compound page, Atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease & high blood pressure research.
Our Notes on the Compound
Insulin Glargine: A long-acting insulin analog given once daily; brands include Lantus, Toujeo, Basaglar and Semglee.
Related Pages
- Atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease & high blood pressure research
- Insulin Glargine in the library
Source: PubMed record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.