← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
E-cigarette versus nicotine inhaler: comparing the perceptions and experiences of inhaled nicotine devices.
Plain-language guide to PMID 24830741 (2014): crossover randomized controlled trial of Therapeutic nicotine (patch, non-peptide) in 2012 participants.
Key Facts
- PMID
- 24830741
- Journal
- Journal of general internal medicine
- Year
- 2014
- Study type
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Authors
- Steinberg MB et al. (7 authors)
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11606-014-2889-7
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
Researchers studied Therapeutic nicotine (patch, non-peptide) in this randomized controlled trial publication.
Understanding this paradox could be helpful to determine the potential for e-cigarettes as an alternative to tobacco smoking.
Why It Was Studied
In contrast, the similar U.S.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved nicotine inhaler is rarely utilized by smokers.
Who Took Part
According to the abstract, 2012 participants were involved.
PubMed indexes the participants as young adults, adults, middle-aged adults and older adults, both men and women.
Thirty-eight participants provided data on product use, perceptions, and experiences.
How the Study Was Run
The researchers set it up as a randomized and crossover study.
Random assignment meant chance, not the researchers, decided who got Therapeutic nicotine (patch, non-peptide) and who got the comparison, which limits bias.
Each person switched between Therapeutic nicotine (patch, non-peptide) and the comparison at some point, usually with a gap in between.
The Modified Cigarette Evaluation Questionnaire (mCEQ) measured satisfaction, reward, and aversion.
Cigarette use was also recorded during the product-use periods.
What Was Measured
PubMed files the paper under topics including Attitude to Health, Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Nebulizers and Vaporizers, New Jersey, Nicotine and Patient Satisfaction.
What This Means in Plain Language
The paper is a randomized and crossover study of Therapeutic nicotine (patch, non-peptide) in 2012 participants.
With several hundred people or more, it is a fairly large study for this kind of research.
The abstract goes on to report its results in about 6 sentences; this page does not restate them, so read the paper for the findings and their limits.
The publication is from 2014 (Journal of general internal medicine), a journal based in United States.
More context: the Therapeutic nicotine (patch, non-peptide) compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compound
Therapeutic nicotine (patch, non-peptide): Pure nicotine as a signaling tool, separated from smoking and vaping.
Related Pages
Source: PubMed record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.