← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Effect of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid supplementation on C-peptide preservation in pregnant women with type-1 diabetes: randomized placebo controlled clinical trial.
Plain-language guide to PMID 28378851 (2017): randomized controlled trial of C-Peptide in 43 women.
Key Facts
- PMID
- 28378851
- Journal
- European journal of clinical nutrition
- Year
- 2017
- Study type
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Authors
- Horvaticek M et al. (5 authors)
- DOI
- 10.1038/ejcn.2017.46
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
The paper reports a study of C-Peptide, published as a randomized controlled trial.
Type-1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is caused by autoimmune insulitis.
There are evidences that pregnancy and n-3 fatty acids exhibit suppressive effect on human inflammatory system.
Who Took Part
The abstract describes 43 women taking part.
PubMed indexes the participants as young adults and adults, women only.
Ninety pregnant women with T1DM were included in the prospective randomized placebo controlled clinical trial.
Duration of T1DM in all participants was between 5 to 30 years.
How the Study Was Run
The design is described as randomized and placebo-controlled.
Because people in this C-Peptide study were split into groups at random, differences between the groups are less likely to reflect who happened to join each one.
A placebo (an inactive look-alike) gave the C-Peptide group a baseline to be compared against.
Blood samples were analyzed from all pregnant women for fasting C-peptide (FC-peptide), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HbA1c in each trimester throughout pregnancy and after delivery.
Umbilical vein blood was analyzed for fetal C-peptide level, glucose concentration and insulin resistance.
What Was Measured
Topics PubMed links to this paper include Biomarkers, C-Peptide, Combined Modality Therapy, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diet, Diabetic, Dietary Supplements and Docosahexaenoic Acids.
What This Means in Plain Language
The paper is a randomized and placebo-controlled study of C-Peptide in 43 women.
Results are reported in around 5 sentences of the abstract; we leave them to the paper itself rather than summarise them.
The publication is from 2017 (European journal of clinical nutrition), a journal based in England.
More context: the C-Peptide compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compound
C-Peptide: The 31-amino-acid fragment cut from proinsulin when insulin is made; it has been given as an investigational treatment in a few trials.
Related Pages
Source: PubMed record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.