← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies

Chronic nicotinamide riboside supplementation is well-tolerated and elevates NAD(+) in healthy middle-aged and older adults

Plain-language guide to PMID 29599478 (2018): double-blind randomized controlled trial study of NAD+.

Key Facts

PMID
29599478
Journal
Nature communications
Year
2018
Study type
Randomized Controlled Trial
Authors
Martens CR et al. (8 authors)
DOI
10.1038/s41467-018-03421-7
Registered trial
NCT04614714, NCT06521307

What This Study Did, in Plain Language

What Was Tested

The paper reports a study of NAD+, published as a randomized controlled trial.

Who Took Part

PubMed indexes the participants as middle-aged adults and older adults, both men and women.

How the Study Was Run

In design terms this was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and crossover study.

The participants were allocated by chance, so the NAD+ group and the comparison group should start out alike.

Neither the participants nor the staff measuring them knew who was on NAD+, so expectations could not easily colour the readings.

Some participants received a placebo instead of NAD+, giving a reference point.

In the crossover set-up each of the participants took both NAD+ and the comparison in turn, acting as their own control.

What Was Measured

PubMed files the paper under topics including Blood Pressure, Caloric Restriction, NAD, Niacinamide, Pyridinium Compounds and Vascular Stiffness.

What This Means in Plain Language

The paper is a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study of NAD+.

The publication is from 2018 (Nature communications), a journal based in England.

More context: the NAD+ compound page, all human trials.

Our Notes on the Compound

NAD+: The coenzyme that accepts electrons at complex I.

Related Pages

Source: PubMed record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.