← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Glutathione infusion before primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomised controlled pilot study
Plain-language guide to PMID 31399448 (2019): double-blind randomized controlled trial study of Glutathione.
Key Facts
- PMID
- 31399448
- Journal
- BMJ open
- Year
- 2019
- Study type
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Authors
- Tanzilli G et al. (18 authors)
- DOI
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025884
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
This randomized controlled trial paper looks at Glutathione.
Glutathione (GSH) is a water-soluble tripeptide with a potent oxidant scavenging activity.
Who Took Part
The age groups tagged for this paper are older adults, both men and women.
How the Study Was Run
In design terms this was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and pilot study.
Because people in this Glutathione study were split into groups at random, differences between the groups are less likely to reflect who happened to join each one.
As a double-blind Glutathione study, the assignments were hidden from both participants and investigators until the end.
A placebo (an inactive look-alike) gave the Glutathione group a baseline to be compared against.
It is described as a pilot, a small early test of whether a larger Glutathione study would be practical.
A time span of 5 days appears in the methods.
Peripheral blood samples were obtained before and at the end of the procedure, as well as after 5 days.
H2O2 production, 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) formation, H2O2 breakdown activity (HBA) and nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability were determined.
Serum cardiactroponin T (cTpT) was measured at admission and up to 5 days.
What Was Measured
The subject headings attached to it are Biomarkers, Coronary Circulation, Glutathione, Oxidative Stress, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Pilot Projects and Preoperative Care.
The authors tagged it with the keywords STEMI, glutathione:, hydrogen peroxide, percutaneous coronary interventions, reactive oxygen species and reperfusion injury.
What This Means in Plain Language
The paper is a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled study of Glutathione over 5 days.
The abstract goes on to report its results in about 4 sentences; this page does not restate them, so read the paper for the findings and their limits.
The publication is from 2019 (BMJ open), a journal based in England.
More context: the Glutathione compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compound
Glutathione: The body's main antioxidant.
Related Pages
Source: PubMed record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.