← Human Trials & Peer-Reviewed Studies
Reduced responsiveness to endothelin-1 in peripheral resistance vessels of patients with syndrome X
Plain-language guide to PMID 9626838 (1998): randomized controlled trial study of Endothelin-1 in 10 patients.
Key Facts
- PMID
- 9626838
- Journal
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Year
- 1998
- Study type
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Authors
- Newby DE et al. (5 authors)
- DOI
- 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00143-0
What This Study Did, in Plain Language
What Was Tested
Researchers studied Endothelin-1 in this randomized controlled trial publication.
This study sought to assess the contribution and action of nitric oxide and endothelin-1 in peripheral resistance vessels of patients with syndrome X.
Why It Was Studied
Patients with syndrome X may have a generalized disorder of vascular and endothelial function, promoting vasospasm.
Who Took Part
The study group was 10 patients.
PubMed indexes the participants as middle-aged adults, both men and women.
Changes in blood flow responses to intrabrachial infusion of the endothelium-dependent vasodilators substance P and acetylcholine, the endothelium-independent nitric oxide donor sodium nitroprusside and the endothelin type A (ET(A)) receptor antagonist BQ-123 were assessed using venous occlusion plethysmography in 10 patients with syndrome X and 10 matched control subjects.
How the Study Was Run
In design terms this was a randomized study.
The patients were allocated by chance, so the Endothelin-1 group and the comparison group should start out alike.
Vasoconstrictor responses to the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L-N(G)-monomethyl arginine (L-NMMA) and endothelin-1 were also determined.
What Was Measured
PubMed files the paper under topics including Analysis of Variance, Endothelin Receptor Antagonists, Endothelin-1, Enzyme Inhibitors, Microvascular Angina, Nitric Oxide and Nitroprusside.
What This Means in Plain Language
The paper is a randomized study of Endothelin-1 in 10 patients.
With fewer than 40 people, it is a small study, so it is better read as an early signal for further research than as a settled answer.
Results are reported in around 5 sentences of the abstract; we leave them to the paper itself rather than summarise them.
The publication is from 1998 (Journal of the American College of Cardiology), a journal based in United States.
More context: the Endothelin-1 compound page, all human trials.
Our Notes on the Compound
Endothelin-1: A 21-amino-acid peptide and one of the strongest blood-vessel constrictors in the body; given in research studies of vascular function.
Related Pages
Source: PubMed record. This explanation is written by PeptideWhiz from the public record. For research and education only. Not medical advice; no dosing information is given.